| [2014] FWCA 7066 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
ARYZTA Australia Pty Ltd T/A ARYZTA Australia
(AG2014/8888)
ARYZTA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY | MELBOURNE, 8 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the ARYZTA Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ARYZTA Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by ARYZTA Australia Pty Ltd T/A ARYZTA Australia. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] United Voice being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 8 October 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 15 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE410532 PR556337>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- ARYZTA Australia Pty Ltd T/A ARYZTA Australia [2014] FWCA 7066
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7066
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to decide were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly concerning the good faith bargaining and the compliance with the procedural fairness. The court also had to consider the fairness of the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement, and whether there was any undue influence or coercion in the bargaining process.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith, with proper procedural fairness observed. The terms of the agreement were deemed fair and reasonable, taking into account the nature of the industry and the bargaining positions of both parties. The Commission concluded that there was no evidence of coercion or undue influence. Consequently, the application for approval was successful, and the Enterprise Agreement 2014 was approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.