| [2024] FWCA 2249 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Arnott’s Biscuits Limited T/A Arnott’s Biscuits Ltd
(AG2024/1987)
ARNOTT’S BISCUITS (VIRGINIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON | BRISBANE, 17 JUNE 2024 |
Application for approval of the Arnott’s Biscuits (Virginia) Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Arnott’s Biscuits (Virginia) Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Arnott’s Biscuits Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]
On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 7.6– Compassionate Leave.
However, noting clause 1.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The United Workers Union (UWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (ETU) have both lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU and the ETU.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 March 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].
[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE525081 PR776112>
- AGLC
- Arnott's Biscuits Limited T/A Arnott's Biscuits Ltd [2024] FWCA 2249
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 2249
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues for the court to decide included whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the 'better off overall test'. This test required the court to determine whether employees would be better off overall under the new agreement than they would be under their previous terms and conditions of employment. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions and whether any terms were unfair.
In considering these issues, the Deputy President examined the submissions and evidence from both parties. The court found that the agreement was generally fair and reasonable and that it met the mandated minimum terms and conditions. The Deputy President concluded that the agreement was in line with the statutory requirements and passed the 'better off overall test', as it provided for improvements in various areas, including wages, leave entitlements, and certain working conditions. The court approved the agreement, ensuring that the terms would benefit the employees while allowing the company to maintain its operational objectives.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.