Arnott's Biscuits Limited T/A Arnott's Biscuits Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 2249


[2024] FWCA 2249

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Arnott’s Biscuits Limited T/A Arnott’s Biscuits Ltd

(AG2024/1987)

ARNOTT’S BISCUITS (VIRGINIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 17 JUNE 2024

Application for approval of the Arnott’s Biscuits (Virginia) Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Arnott’s Biscuits (Virginia) Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Arnott’s Biscuits Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 7.6– Compassionate Leave.

However, noting clause 1.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The United Workers Union (UWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (ETU) have both lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU and the ETU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 24 March 2027.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].

[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE525081  PR776112>

Details
AGLC
Arnott's Biscuits Limited T/A Arnott's Biscuits Ltd [2024] FWCA 2249
Case
[2024] FWCA 2249
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, the matter before the Deputy President was an application for the approval of the Arnott's Biscuits (Virginia) Enterprise Agreement 2024. The parties involved were Arnott's Biscuits Limited, trading as Arnott's Biscuits Ltd, and the relevant union. The dispute centred around the terms and conditions of employment for certain employees within the Virginia manufacturing plant. The union sought to ensure that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for its members, while the company aimed to maintain operational efficiency and competitiveness.

The legal issues for the court to decide included whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the 'better off overall test'. This test required the court to determine whether employees would be better off overall under the new agreement than they would be under their previous terms and conditions of employment. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions and whether any terms were unfair.

In considering these issues, the Deputy President examined the submissions and evidence from both parties. The court found that the agreement was generally fair and reasonable and that it met the mandated minimum terms and conditions. The Deputy President concluded that the agreement was in line with the statutory requirements and passed the 'better off overall test', as it provided for improvements in various areas, including wages, leave entitlements, and certain working conditions. The court approved the agreement, ensuring that the terms would benefit the employees while allowing the company to maintain its operational objectives.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.