Armstrong v Armstrong
Case
•
[2004] WASC 121
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Armstrong v Armstrong [2004] WASC 121
[2004] WASC 121
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Armstrong v Armstrong was heard in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. The plaintiff, Debra Ann Armstrong, sought to have two caveats extended that protected her claim to an interest in certain farming land. The first defendant, Brian Arthur Armstrong, is the plaintiff's husband, and the second defendant, Yvonne Rose Armstrong, is Brian's mother. The plaintiff also sought permission to amend her statement of claim and transfer the proceedings to the Family Court of Western Australia. The court found that the caveats should be extended until trial. The proposed amendments to the statement of claim were to be permitted, subject to certain objections being allowed. The proceedings were transferred to the Family Court of Western Australia.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Constructive Trust
-
Equitable Charge
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Standing
-
Jurisdiction
-
Transfer of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Armstrong v Armstrong [2004] WASC 121
Most Recent Citation
Zhang v Zhang & Anor [2024] VSC 3
Cases Citing This Decision
26
The President's Club Ltd v Palmer Coolum Resort Pty Ltd
[2019] QSC 209
Cases Cited
17
Statutory Material Cited
0
Bathurst City Council v PWC Properties Pty Ltd
[1998] HCA 59
Muschinski v Dodds
[1985] HCA 78
Bertei v Feher
[2000] WASCA 165