Armstrong v Armstrong

Case

[2004] WASC 121


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Armstrong v Armstrong [2004] WASC 121 [2004] WASC 121

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Armstrong v Armstrong was heard in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. The plaintiff, Debra Ann Armstrong, sought to have two caveats extended that protected her claim to an interest in certain farming land. The first defendant, Brian Arthur Armstrong, is the plaintiff's husband, and the second defendant, Yvonne Rose Armstrong, is Brian's mother. The plaintiff also sought permission to amend her statement of claim and transfer the proceedings to the Family Court of Western Australia. The court found that the caveats should be extended until trial. The proposed amendments to the statement of claim were to be permitted, subject to certain objections being allowed. The proceedings were transferred to the Family Court of Western Australia.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Constructive Trust

  • Equitable Charge

  • Unconscionable Conduct

  • Standing

  • Jurisdiction

  • Transfer of Proceedings

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Zhang v Zhang & Anor [2024] VSC 3

Cases Cited

17

Statutory Material Cited

0

Muschinski v Dodds [1985] HCA 78
Bertei v Feher [2000] WASCA 165