ARMITAGE & ARMITAGE
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 2974
•5 November 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Armitage and Armitage [2015] FCCA 2974
[2015] FCCA 2974
5 November 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of ARMITAGE & ARMITAGE, Judge Coker of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia made orders concerning the property settlement between the parties. The dispute centred on the division of assets and liabilities following the breakdown of the marriage.
The court was required to determine how the parties' various assets, including a sum of money held in trust, a property identified as Property B, and several motor vehicles, along with associated liabilities, should be divided. The court also considered the need for an injunction to restrain the husband from dealing with Property B.
Judge Coker ordered that $44,000 held in a solicitor's trust account be released to the Wife absolutely. The Husband was directed to sell Property B under the Wife's direction as to manner and price, with the net proceeds, after payment of existing liabilities and rates, to be paid to the Wife. An injunction was granted to prevent the Husband from dealing with Property B. The Wife was to retain her motor vehicle and other possessions, indemnifying the Husband against any liabilities attaching to them. Similarly, the Husband was to retain his motor vehicles and other possessions, indemnifying the Wife against any liabilities, including taxation arising from his business. Provisions were also made for the determination of costs should any party seek them.
The court was required to determine how the parties' various assets, including a sum of money held in trust, a property identified as Property B, and several motor vehicles, along with associated liabilities, should be divided. The court also considered the need for an injunction to restrain the husband from dealing with Property B.
Judge Coker ordered that $44,000 held in a solicitor's trust account be released to the Wife absolutely. The Husband was directed to sell Property B under the Wife's direction as to manner and price, with the net proceeds, after payment of existing liabilities and rates, to be paid to the Wife. An injunction was granted to prevent the Husband from dealing with Property B. The Wife was to retain her motor vehicle and other possessions, indemnifying the Husband against any liabilities attaching to them. Similarly, the Husband was to retain his motor vehicles and other possessions, indemnifying the Wife against any liabilities, including taxation arising from his business. Provisions were also made for the determination of costs should any party seek them.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Remedies
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Armitage and Armitage [2015] FCCA 2974
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd
[2015] HCA 36
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
Erdem & Ozsoy
[2012] FMCAfam 1323