Armest Pty Ltd T/A Miles Witt Partnership

Case [2021] FWCA 333


[2021] FWCA 333
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Armest Pty Ltd T/A Miles Witt Partnership
(AG2020/3864)

BETHANY CHRISTIAN CARE SUPPORT STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Aged care industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY

BRISBANE, 27 JANUARY 2021

Application for approval of the Bethany Christian Care Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] Armest Pty Ltd T/A Miles Witt Partnership (the Applicant) as bargaining representative for Bethany Christian Care applies to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bethany Christian Care Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] Undertakings were provided by the Applicant in response to concerns the Commission held in relation to the operation of certain clauses and whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test. A copy of the Undertakings is attached as Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person or organisation the Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement has been sought in relation to the Undertakings. Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. In accordance with s.201(3) of the Act, a copy of the undertakings will be attached to the Agreement and forms part of the Agreement.

[4] I observe that the following clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 31 – Public holidays;

  Clause 11.1(e) – Notice of termination.

[5] However, I note clause 6.1 of the Agreement provides that where there is an inconsistency between a provision of the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES provision will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. On this basis, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES. I also note that by virtue of s.55 of the Act, an enterprise agreement must not exclude the NES or any provisions of the NES and s.56 provides that a term of an enterprise agreement has no effect to the extent that it contravenes s.55.

[6] I am satisfied, on the basis of information set out in the Form F16 Application for approval of an enterprise agreement, the Form F17 Employer’s declaration in support of an application for approval of the Agreement and responses to requests for further information provided by the Applicant, that each of the requirements of ss.l86, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account ss.186(3) and (3A), and on the basis of the information contained in the Form F17, I am satisfied that the group of employees covered by the Agreement was fairly chosen.

[7] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover that organisation. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[8] The Agreement is approved in accordance with s.54 of the Act and will operate from 3 February 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2022.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE510175  PR726377>

Annexure A.

Details
AGLC
Armest Pty Ltd T/A Miles Witt Partnership [2021] FWCA 333
Case
[2021] FWCA 333
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Armest Pty Ltd, trading as Miles Witt Partnership, recently applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Bethany Christian Care Support Staff Enterprise Agreement 2020. The application was made under section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009, seeking the Commission’s endorsement of the agreement. The applicant, Armest, argued that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for the support staff employed by Bethany Christian Care, including provisions on wages, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining whether the agreement met the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act for being deemed "registered". This included assessing if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, if it was made in good faith, and if it adhered to the procedural fairness standards. The Commission also had to consider the extent to which the agreement balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees, and whether it complied with the Act’s mandate for minimum standards of employment.

In making its decision, the Commission reviewed the content of the agreement, the process through which it was negotiated, and the evidence provided by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable for the employees, and that it was negotiated in good faith. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval, and it approved the agreement under section 232 of the Fair Work Act. The decision emphasised the importance of ensuring that the terms and conditions of employment in the agreement were fair and reasonable, and that they complied with the legislative framework designed to protect the interests of both employers and employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.