| [2016] FWCA 5791 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ardent Leisure Limited T/A Dreamworld, WhiteWater World and SkyPoint
(AG2016/3359)
DREAMWORLD/WHITEWATER WORLD AND SKYPOINT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (NO 9) 2016
Amusement, events and recreation industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 17 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the Dreamworld/WhiteWater World and SkyPoint Enterprise Agreement (No 9) 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Dreamworld/WhiteWater World and SkyPoint Enterprise Agreement (No 9) 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Ardent Leisure Limited T/A Dreamworld, WhiteWater World and SkyPoint. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement was approved on 17 August 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 24 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 August 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE420598 PR584338>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Ardent Leisure Limited T/A Dreamworld, WhiteWater World and SkyPoint [2016] FWCA 5791
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5791
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed Enterprise Agreement (No 9) 2016 complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement met the 'better off overall test', which ensures that employees are not worse off financially under the new agreement compared to their previous conditions. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement appropriately addressed the needs of different employee groups, including part-time and casual workers, and whether it adhered to the provisions of the National Employment Standards.
The Fair Work Commission, in its decision, assessed the proposed agreement against the statutory criteria set out in the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the agreement provided a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees, as it met the better off overall test and included provisions that addressed the specific needs of various employee groups. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it provided for adequate wages, reasonable working hours, and appropriate conditions that were in line with the legislative requirements. The decision also highlighted that the agreement incorporated protections for vulnerable employee groups and met the necessary standards for approval under the Fair Work Act.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Dreamworld/WhiteWater World and SkyPoint Enterprise Agreement (No 9) 2016, confirming its compliance with the statutory requirements. The agreement was deemed to be fair and reasonable, providing for the adequate protection of employee interests and meeting the necessary conditions for approval under the Fair Work Act. The decision effectively resolves the dispute, allowing the proposed agreement to be implemented as the new terms of employment for the affected workers.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.