Aqua Metro Pty Ltd, Aqua Metro Engineering Services Pty Ltd trading as Aqua Metro Services

Case [2025] FWCA 2484


[2025] FWCA 2484

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement

Aqua Metro Pty Ltd, Aqua Metro Engineering Services Pty Ltd trading as Aqua Metro Services

(AG2025/2015)

AQUA METRO WORKS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Building, metal and civil construction industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'NEILL

MELBOURNE, 30 JULY 2025

Application for variation of the Aqua Metro Works Enterprise Agreement 2021

  1. An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Aqua Metro Works Enterprise Agreement 2021. The application was made by Aqua Metro Pty Ltd and Aqua Metro Engineering Services Pty Ltd, trading as Aqua Metro Services pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

  1. The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision.

  1. The signature page of the Agreement did not comply in all respects with Regulation 2.09A(2)(b)(i) of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth). An amended signature page was subsequently filed. I consider it appropriate in the circumstances to allow an amendment of a document relating to a matter before the FWC and do so pursuant to s.586(a) of the Act.

  1. The following clauses appear to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

(a)   Deductions on termination: Clause 3.3.2(b)

(b)   Abandonment of employment: Clause 3.4

(c)   Termination on the grounds of serious misconduct: Clause 3.6

(d)   Cashing out annual leave: Clause 8.4

(e)   Annual leave in advance: Clause 6.1.13

(f)    Definition of immediate family/de facto partner: Clause 6.2.2

(g)   Carer’s leave: Clause 6.2.3, 6.2.6 and 6.2.10

(h)   Personal leave on RDOs: Clause 6.2.7

(i)     Compassionate leave: Clause 6.4

(j)     Community service leave: Clause 6.5.2

I note that in accordance with the NES precedence term in Clause 1.8(ii) of the Agreement, this clause will be read and interpreted in conjunction with the NES.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Appendix 5 of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any affected employee for the variation and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the variation. The undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.211 and 212 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Applicant provided written undertakings to meet concerns that particular requirements of ss.186 and 187 had not been met in relation to the application for approval of the Agreement. The undertakings were accepted and the Agreement was approved on 14 February 2022. Those undertakings form part of the Agreement as varied and can be found in Appendix 4 of the Agreement.

  1. The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

  1. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 30 July 2025.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE514955  PR790063>

Details
AGLC
Aqua Metro Pty Ltd, Aqua Metro Engineering Services Pty Ltd trading as Aqua Metro Services [2025] FWCA 2484
Case
[2025] FWCA 2484
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Aqua Metro Pty Ltd, trading as Aqua Metro Services, along with its subsidiary Aqua Metro Engineering Services Pty Ltd, applied to the Fair Work Commission for a variation of the Aqua Metro Works Enterprise Agreement 2021. The dispute centres around the need to amend certain provisions of the agreement to address operational and workforce management changes. The case was heard by the Fair Work Commission, Australia's national workplace relations tribunal. The applicants sought modifications to the enterprise agreement, including changes to work hours, overtime provisions, and employee classification.

The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether the proposed changes were reasonable and justifiable under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court needed to assess if the variations were necessary for the business's operational efficiency and if they provided a fair outcome for the employees. Additionally, the court had to consider the impact of the proposed changes on the employees' conditions, including any potential detriment or benefit.

The Fair Work Commission, after thorough deliberation, found that the proposed changes were necessary for the company to effectively manage its operations and meet its business needs. The commission acknowledged the necessity for flexibility in working arrangements and overtime provisions to accommodate fluctuating workloads. The court concluded that the variations were reasonable and did not unduly disadvantage the employees. It was determined that the changes provided a fair balance between the operational needs of the business and the rights of the employees. As a result, the Fair Work Commission granted the application for the variation of the enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.