| [2019] FWCA 1756 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Appselec Qld Pty Ltd
(AG2019/501)
APPSELEC QLD PTY LIMITED AND CEPU ELECTRICAL DIVISION QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2019
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 18 MARCH 2019 |
Application for approval of the Appselec Qld Pty Limited and CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Appselec Qld Pty Limited and CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Appselec Qld Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 18 March 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 25 March 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502351 PR705951>
- AGLC
- Appselec Qld Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 1756
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 1756
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved verifying the procedural fairness of the agreement-making process, ensuring that the agreement addressed all required matters, and confirming that it provided for the proper operation of the workplace. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement included adequate provisions for employee entitlements, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
The Commission carefully reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the agreement was the product of a process that met the requirements of procedural fairness, as both parties had engaged in genuine bargaining. The agreement was comprehensive, addressing all mandatory matters and providing for fair terms and conditions of employment. The Commission concluded that the agreement was fair and appropriate for approval, as it balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees.
The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement, confirming its compliance with the necessary legislative standards. The agreement was deemed to provide for the proper operation of the workplace and to include adequate provisions for employee entitlements and dispute resolution. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements are the result of genuine bargaining and that they adequately address all required matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.