Application of Miguela Alvarez Macatangay
Case
•
[2018] NSWSC 42
•02 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Application of Miguela Alvarez Macatangay [2018] NSWSC 42
[2018] NSWSC 42
02 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Miguela Alvarez Macatangay applied for leave to bring proceedings against the Commonwealth of Australia, the Attorney-General for the Commonwealth, and others. Macatangay had previously been declared a vexatious litigant by the Federal Court. The Federal Court of Australia was asked to determine if she should be allowed to bring further proceedings against the Commonwealth.
The court had to decide if Macatangay's application for leave to proceed was frivolous or vexatious. It also had to consider whether there were exceptional circumstances that warranted an exception to the declaration of vexatious litigant. The court was required to balance Macatangay's right to access the courts with the need to prevent abuse of the judicial process.
The court found that Macatangay's application was indeed frivolous and vexatious. It noted that she had brought numerous proceedings against the Commonwealth over the past several years, all of which had been dismissed. The court found that there were no exceptional circumstances that warranted an exception to the declaration of vexatious litigant. It held that allowing Macatangay to bring further proceedings would be an abuse of the judicial process.
Macatangay's application for leave to institute proceedings was dismissed. The court ordered that she pay costs of the application.
The court had to decide if Macatangay's application for leave to proceed was frivolous or vexatious. It also had to consider whether there were exceptional circumstances that warranted an exception to the declaration of vexatious litigant. The court was required to balance Macatangay's right to access the courts with the need to prevent abuse of the judicial process.
The court found that Macatangay's application was indeed frivolous and vexatious. It noted that she had brought numerous proceedings against the Commonwealth over the past several years, all of which had been dismissed. The court found that there were no exceptional circumstances that warranted an exception to the declaration of vexatious litigant. It held that allowing Macatangay to bring further proceedings would be an abuse of the judicial process.
Macatangay's application for leave to institute proceedings was dismissed. The court ordered that she pay costs of the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Vexatious Litigant
-
Jurisdiction
-
Leave to Sue
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Application of Miguela Alvarez Macatangay [2018] NSWSC 1183
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Application of Miguela Alvarez Macatangay
[2018] NSWSC 1183
Application of Miguela Alvarez Macatangay
[2018] NSWSC 1183
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
1
Macatangay v State of New South Wales
[2012] NSWCA 374
Macatangay v State of New South Wales
[2007] NSWSC 57
Macatangay v State of New South Wales (No 2)
[2009] NSWCA 272