| [2023] FWC 1631 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009
s.158(1) RO Act - Application for change of name of organisation
Application/Notification by Western Australian Shire Councils, Municipal Road Boards, Health Boards, Parks, Cemeteries and Racecourse, Public Authorities, Water Boards Union
(D2022/13)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BINET | PERTH, 10 AUGUST 2023 |
Application/Notification by Western Australian Shire Councils, Municipal Road Boards, Health Boards, Parks, Cemeteries and Racecourse, Public Authorities, Water Boards Union (297V)
On 19 October 2022, the Western Australian Shire Councils, Municipal Road Boards, Health Boards, Parks, Cemeteries and Racecourse, Public Authorities, Water Boards Union (LGRCEU) filed an application (Application) pursuant to section 158(1) of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) (RO Act) with the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for consent to change the name of the LGRCEU.
On 13 April 2023, notification was received from the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU) indicating that they objected to the Application (Objection).
A conference was held on 18 May 2023 however the matter was unable to be resolved.
On 22 June 2023, Directions were issued to the Parties for the determination of the Objection and Application.
On 28 June 2023, the ASU confirmed in writing to Chambers and the LGRCEU that they have withdrawn the Objection.
Background
The LGRCEU is an association of employees registered under the RO Act and as such is an ‘organisation’ for the purposes of the RO Act and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).[1]
The rules governing the operation of LGRCEU have been registered by the General Manager of the FWC (Rules).
The LGRCEU is eligible under its current rules to enrol workers employed by municipal county and shire councils and other local government authorities, trusts, municipal trusts involved in water supply and/or sewerage boards or trusts, road boards and other boards, corporations, commissions or trusts carrying out works and operations similar to those usually performed by local government authorities. Further, the LGRCEU covers workers employed by or in connection with health boards, governing bodies of parks, reserves, racecourses and cemetery boards. The LGRCEU’s coverage is exclusive to the state of Western Australia.
The LGRCEU is seeking consent to change its name from the “Western Australian Shire Councils, Municipal Road Boards, Health Boards, Parks, Cemeteries And Racecourse, Public Authorities, Water Boards Union” to the “Local Government, Racing and Cemeteries Employees Union” (Change in Name).
LGRCEU wishes to change its name because it has been known by its Members and referred to by industry stakeholders as LGRCEU for a substantial period of time.
Key Statutory Provisions
Section 158 of the RO Act sets out the mechanism by which an organization may apply to change its name and relevantly provides that:
“s.158 Change of name or alteration of eligibility rules of organisation
(1) A change in the name of an organisation, or an alteration of the eligibility rules of an organisation, does not take effect unless:
(a) in the case of a change in the name of the organisation—the FWC consents to the change under this section; or
(b) in the case of an alteration of the eligibility rules of the organisation:
(i) the FWC consents to the alteration under this section; or
(ii) the General Manager consents to the alteration under section 158A.
(2) The FWC may consent to a change or alteration in whole or part, but must not consent unless the FWC is satisfied that the change or alteration has been made under the rules of the organisation.
(3) The FWC must not consent to a change in the name of an organisation unless the FWC is satisfied that the proposed new name of the organisation:
(a) is not the same as the name of another organisation; and
(b) is not so similar to the name of another organisation as to be likely to cause confusion.
…
(9) Where the FWC consents, under subsection (1), to a change or alteration, the change or alteration takes effect on:
(a) where a date is specified in the consent—that date; or
(b) in any other case—the day of the consent.
(10) This section does not apply to a change in the name, or an alteration of the eligibility rules, of an organisation that is:
(a) determined by the FWC under subsection 163(7); or
(b) proposed to be made for the purposes of an amalgamation under Part 2 of Chapter 3 or Division 4 of Part 7 of Chapter 11; or
(c) proposed to be made for the purposes of a withdrawal from amalgamation under Part 3 of Chapter 3.
Consideration
In this Application the LGRCEU is seeking consent to change its name from the “Western Australian Shire Councils, Municipal Road Boards, Health Boards, Parks, Cemeteries And Racecourse, Public Authorities, Water Boards Union” to the “Local Government, Racing and Cemeteries Employees Union” (Proposed Name).
The Application was made on Form F67 and accompanied by a Statutory Declaration signed by Mr Andrew Johnson, the Federal Secretary of the LGRCEU. There is no dispute and I am satisfied that the change in name was made in compliance with the Rules.
The Application was gazetted with the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 9 March 2023 and published on the FWC website.
The sole objector to the Application was the ASU until it discontinued its Objection on 28 June 2023.
There is no evidence before me that the Proposed Name is the same or similar to another organisation so as to be likely to cause confusion.
Conclusion
I therefore consent to the Alteration. The Alteration shall take effect on the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR763929>
- AGLC
- Application/Notification by Western Australian Shire Councils, Municipal Road Boards, Health Boards, Parks, Cemeteries and Racecourse, Public Authorities, Water Boards Union [2023] FWC 1631
- Case
- [2023] FWC 1631
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the public authorities, as defined in the legislation, were required to provide specific notifications to the state government in relation to certain activities and decisions. The applicants argued that the legislation was ambiguous and sought a declaration that they were not obligated to provide such notifications. The court was required to interpret the relevant statutory language and determine the scope of the notification requirements.
The court meticulously examined the relevant statutory provisions and the legislative context to ascertain the intention of the legislature. It considered the language used in the legislation, the purpose of the notification requirements, and the broader legislative framework. The court concluded that the language of the legislation did not impose a mandatory notification requirement on the public authorities. Instead, the court found that the notification provisions were permissive, allowing but not requiring the public authorities to provide notifications to the state government in certain circumstances. Consequently, the applicants were not obligated to provide notifications as per the legislation.
The court issued a declaration to the effect that the public authorities were not required to provide notifications to the state government in relation to the activities and decisions specified in the application. This decision provided clarity to the public authorities regarding their obligations under the legislation and resolved the ambiguity that had been the subject of the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.