Application by South Melbourne Continental Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2018] VSC 398
•20 July 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Application by South Melbourne Continental Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 398
[2018] VSC 398
20 July 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
South Melbourne Continental Pty Ltd applied to the Supreme Court of Victoria for a declaration that the trust deed governing its assets be reconstructed and for orders that the trustee approve past transactions of the trustee. The respondent, D. R. McKendry Nominees Pty Ltd, opposed the application, arguing that the plaintiff had not made all reasonable efforts to locate the trust deed and had not provided sufficient evidence of the contents of the trust deed. The court was required to determine whether the plaintiff had made all reasonable efforts to locate the trust deed and whether there was sufficient evidence of the contents of the trust deed to support the application.
The court found that the plaintiff had not made all reasonable efforts to locate the trust deed, as it had not made inquiries of certain individuals who may have had knowledge of the location of the trust deed. The court also found that there was insufficient evidence of the contents of the trust deed to support the application. The court held that, in the absence of a trust deed, it was unable to make the orders sought by the plaintiff. The court dismissed the application, noting that the plaintiff had not discharged the onus of proving that all reasonable efforts had been made to locate the trust deed and that the contents of the trust deed were sufficiently established. The court also noted that, in the absence of a trust deed, it was not possible to determine the terms of the trust and the rights and obligations of the parties.
The court found that the plaintiff had not made all reasonable efforts to locate the trust deed, as it had not made inquiries of certain individuals who may have had knowledge of the location of the trust deed. The court also found that there was insufficient evidence of the contents of the trust deed to support the application. The court held that, in the absence of a trust deed, it was unable to make the orders sought by the plaintiff. The court dismissed the application, noting that the plaintiff had not discharged the onus of proving that all reasonable efforts had been made to locate the trust deed and that the contents of the trust deed were sufficiently established. The court also noted that, in the absence of a trust deed, it was not possible to determine the terms of the trust and the rights and obligations of the parties.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Admissibility of Evidence
-
Discovery & Disclosure
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Application by Ellasil Pty Ltd [2023] VSC 69
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Tucker v Broderick
[2021] FCA 1492
Application by Ellasil Pty Ltd
[2023] VSC 69
Re Dove Family Trust
[2022] VSC 625
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
D.R. McKendry Nominees Pty Ltd
[2015] VSC 560
Payten v Perpetual Trustee Company
[2005] NSWSC 345
Minassian v Minassian
[2010] NSWSC 708