| [2021] FWCA 6515 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Application by Prosegur Australia Pty Limited
(AG2021/7965)
Clerical industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 2 NOVEMBER 2021 |
Application for termination of the Prosegur Australia Pty Limited Beresfield Cash Processing Enterprise Agreement 2019-2020
[1] By an application dated 18 October 2021, Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant) applied to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) to terminate the Prosegur Australia Pty Limited Beresfield Cash Processing Enterprise Agreement 2019-2020 (Agreement) under s 222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement had a nominal expiry date of 20 December 2020.
[2] Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an enterprise agreement to be terminated pursuant to s 222 of the Act:
223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement
If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and
(b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and
(c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and
(d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.
[3] The application was supported by a Statutory Declaration made by Mr Gavin Lynch, Workplace Relations Manager of the Applicant, on 19 October 2021. Mr Lynch declared, amongst other things, that 12 of the 23 employees covered by the Agreement voted to terminate the Agreement.
[4] On 22 October 2021, I directed that:
1. By 4pm on 26 October 2021, Prosegur must provide to each employee who is covered by the Agreement:
a. a copy of Prosegur’s application to terminate the Agreement, together with the documents filed by Prosegur in the Fair Work Commission in support of its application to terminate the Agreement; and
b. a copy of this email.
2. Any employee of Prosegur who wishes to raise any concerns in relation to Prosegur’s application to terminate the Agreement must send an email to Chambers.Saunders.DP@fwc.gov.au setting out their concerns by 4pm on 1 November 2021.
3. By 4pm on 1 November 2021, the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union must file and serve any submissions it wishes to rely on in relation to Prosegur’s application to terminate the Agreement.”
[5] On 26 October 2021, the Applicant informed the Commission, in writing, that it had complied with direction 1 above.
[6] On 27 October 2021, the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union informed the Commission that it did not intend to file any submissions in relation to the Applicant’s application to terminate the Agreement.
[7] No submissions, statements or documents were filed by or on behalf of any employee in opposition to the application to terminate the Agreement.
[8] Based on the material that is before the Commission, including the statutory declaration made by Mr Lynch on 19 October 2021, I am satisfied that the requirements of s 223 of the Act have been met, including that I consider it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement in circumstances where employees will be covered by the Clerks – Private Sector Award 2020 and will be entitled to the benefits promised to them by the Applicant after the termination of the Agreement. Accordingly, I approve the termination of the Agreement.
[9] In accordance with s 224 of the Act, the termination of the Agreement will come into effect at 5:00pm on 5 November 2021. An order [PR735433] giving effect to this decision will be issued today.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
< PR735432>
- AGLC
- Application by Prosegur Australia Pty Limited [2021] FWCA 6515
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 6515
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether there had been a substantial change in circumstances sufficient to warrant termination of the enterprise agreement. The key issue was whether the applicant could demonstrate that the change was significant enough to justify terminating the agreement, which was in place for the specified period. The court also considered whether the agreement's termination would unfairly disadvantage the employees.
The Fair Work Commission found that there had indeed been a substantial change in circumstances, primarily due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cash processing industry. The pandemic had led to reduced demand for cash processing services, which significantly affected the applicant's business operations and financial stability. The Commission concluded that the changes were substantial and warranted termination of the enterprise agreement. The court also found that the termination would not unfairly disadvantage the employees, as the changes were beyond the control of the parties and had a significant impact on the applicant's business. Therefore, the application was successful.
The Fair Work Commission ordered the termination of the Prosegur Australia Pty Limited Beresfield Cash Processing Enterprise Agreement 2019-2020, effective from the date of the decision. The order allowed the applicant to implement new terms and conditions for the employees in line with the changed circumstances. The respondents were given the opportunity to apply for a new enterprise agreement, reflecting the current operational realities of the cash processing industry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.