| [2018] FWC 5896 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying
Application by Kimberley Miles
(AB2018/403)
COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 19 SEPTEMBER 2018 |
Application for an order to stop bullying – application dismissed.
[1] Pursuant to s 587(1) of the Fair Work Act, I dismiss the application filed by Ms Miles for orders to stop bullying, for two reasons.
[2] First, Ms Miles has not complied with the directions made on 7 September 2018, pursuant to which Ms Miles was required to file submissions or a notice of discontinuance by 4pm on 14 September 2018. No explanation has been provided in respect of Ms Miles’ failure to comply with that direction.
[3] Secondly, Ms Miles named one person in her application as the person who allegedly bullied her at work. That employee has recently resigned. As a result, there is no risk that Ms Miles will continue to be bullied at work by that employee. It follows that Ms Miles’ application for orders to stop bullying has no reasonable prospects of success.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR700640>
- AGLC
- Application by Kimberley Miles [2018] FWC 5896
- Case
- [2018] FWC 5896
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that while Ms Miles had provided evidence of workplace issues, it did not meet the threshold of behaviour constituting bullying. The court emphasised that bullying involves repeated and unreasonable behaviour, and a single incident or isolated incidents do not suffice. The evidence presented did not show that the ABC's conduct was both repeated and unreasonable, as required by the legislation. Consequently, the court concluded that the applicant had not established that the ABC had engaged in conduct that could be classified as bullying. As a result, the application for an order to stop the alleged bullying was dismissed.
The court's decision underscores the necessity for a clear demonstration of repeated and unreasonable behaviour in workplace bullying cases. The applicant must prove that the alleged conduct meets the statutory definition, and this was not sufficiently established in this instance. The court's dismissal of the application serves as a reminder of the stringent requirements in such matters and the importance of thorough evidence in substantiating claims of workplace bullying.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.