Application by J.O

Case [2016] FWC 2054


[2016] FWC 2054

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying
J.O.
(AB2016/50)
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON ADELAIDE, 5 APRIL 2016
Application for an FWC order to stop bullying.

[1]        On 25 February 2016, J.O. made an application for an order to stop bullying under

s.789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[2]        The application was not completed on the prescribed form (Form F72) and was not

accompanied by the required filing fee.

[3]        On 26 February 2016, J.O. was advised by letter that Form F72 was required to be

completed and payment of the filing fee, or a completed waiver form, was required if she

wished to proceed with the application.

[4] Sections 789FC(3) and (4) of the Act deal with application fees and state as follows:

“789FC Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

...

(3) The application must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(4) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this section; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or
refunded.”

[5]        The Fair Work Regulations 2009 prescribe a filing fee and the circumstances under

which a waiver can be considered.

[6]        On 4 March 2016, the Commission wrote again to J.O. in relation to the matter. J.O.

was advised that the application may be dismissed without further notice or hearing if the

required payment was not made within 14 days.

[7]        On 18 March 2016, the Commission made a further attempt to contact J.O. in relation

to the matter.
[2016] FWC 2054

[8]        No further response has been received from J.O. The payment of the required fee has

not been made and no further action has been taken by her or on her behalf.

[9]        Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

“587 Dismissing applications

(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may

dismiss an application if:

(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.”

[10]      In considering all the circumstances, I am satisfied that the relevant application was

not accompanied by the prescribed fee and has not been made in accordance with the Act. I

am also satisfied that it is appropriate in all of the circumstances to dismiss the application.

[11]      Accordingly, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(a) of the Act.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR578603>

Details
AGLC
Application by J.O [2016] FWC 2054
Case
[2016] FWC 2054
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves an application by J.O. for an order to stop bullying under section 789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was filed on 25 February 2016 but was incomplete, as it was not submitted on the required Form F72 and lacked the necessary filing fee. Following the submission, J.O. was notified by the Fair Work Commission that the application was incomplete and that she needed to complete the form and pay the fee to proceed. Despite subsequent reminders, J.O. did not complete the application as directed.

The legal issues before the court were whether the application complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the failure to complete the required form and pay the filing fee justified the dismissal of the application under section 587(1)(a) of the Act, which allows for the dismissal of applications that are not made in accordance with the Act.

The Commissioner found that the application was not accompanied by the prescribed fee and had not been made in accordance with the Act. Given that J.O. had been notified of the deficiencies and had not taken any steps to remedy them, the Commissioner concluded that the application was not compliant. Additionally, the Commissioner found that dismissing the application was appropriate given the circumstances. Therefore, the application was dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the Act.

In conclusion, the court dismissed the application for failure to comply with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act and the associated regulations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.