Application by Grahame Patrick Kelly – withdrawal from amalgamated organisation – Mining and Energy Division – Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
Case
•
[2021] FWCFB 6002
•14 SEPTEMBER 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Application by Grahame Patrick Kelly – withdrawal from amalgamated organisation – Mining and Energy Division – Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2021] FWCFB 6002
[2021] FWCFB 6002
14 SEPTEMBER 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the recent decision, Grahame Patrick Kelly applied to the Fair Work Commission for permission to withdraw from the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, specifically from the Mining and Energy Division. The dispute centred on whether Kelly was entitled to de-register from the union under the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The case was heard in the Fair Work Commission, an Australian federal statutory tribunal responsible for resolving workplace disputes and making decisions regarding workplace relations.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Kelly met the criteria for withdrawal as stipulated in the Fair Work Act. The Act allows employees to apply for withdrawal if they are not represented by the union in bargaining, are not covered by an applicable enterprise agreement, and if the union has not provided services to them within the last 12 months. The Commission had to determine if Kelly satisfied these conditions and whether there were any other factors that might preclude his application.
The Fair Work Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties to ascertain whether Kelly met the statutory requirements for withdrawal. It considered whether Kelly was genuinely not represented by the union in bargaining, if he was not covered by an applicable enterprise agreement, and if the union had indeed failed to provide services. The Commission concluded that Kelly had satisfied the criteria for withdrawal and found that the union had not provided any services to him within the required timeframe. As such, the Commission granted Kelly's application, allowing him to de-register from the union.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that Grahame Patrick Kelly be permitted to withdraw from the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, specifically from the Mining and Energy Division. This decision affirms the right of employees to withdraw from a union under the specified conditions set out in the Fair Work Act.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Kelly met the criteria for withdrawal as stipulated in the Fair Work Act. The Act allows employees to apply for withdrawal if they are not represented by the union in bargaining, are not covered by an applicable enterprise agreement, and if the union has not provided services to them within the last 12 months. The Commission had to determine if Kelly satisfied these conditions and whether there were any other factors that might preclude his application.
The Fair Work Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties to ascertain whether Kelly met the statutory requirements for withdrawal. It considered whether Kelly was genuinely not represented by the union in bargaining, if he was not covered by an applicable enterprise agreement, and if the union had indeed failed to provide services. The Commission concluded that Kelly had satisfied the criteria for withdrawal and found that the union had not provided any services to him within the required timeframe. As such, the Commission granted Kelly's application, allowing him to de-register from the union.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that Grahame Patrick Kelly be permitted to withdraw from the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union, specifically from the Mining and Energy Division. This decision affirms the right of employees to withdraw from a union under the specified conditions set out in the Fair Work Act.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Union Membership
-
Collective Bargaining
-
Collective Agreement
-
Union Rights
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Advanced Civil Group Pty Ltd and Australian Workers' Union, The [2024] FWCFB 246
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union v Advanced Civil Group Pty Ltd and Australian Workers' Union, The
[2024] FWCFB 246
Qube Ports Pty Ltd T/A Qube Ports v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union the Maritime Union of Australia Division
[2023] FWCFB 102
Application by Grahame Patrick Kelly
[2023] FWCFB 64
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Bowker v DP World Melbourne Ltd
[2014] FWCFB 9227
Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority
[1998] HCA 28
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v GSF Australia Pty Ltd
[2005] HCA 26