[2016] FWC 2436
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order |
"Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries
Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU)
v
The Chocolate and Confectionery Company Pty Ltd T/A Ernest Hillier
(B2016/66)
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 18 APRIL 2016 |
Proposed protected action ballot of employees of The Chocolate and Confectionery Company
Pty Ltd.
[1] This is an application by “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and
Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)
(the Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a protected action
ballot order in relation to certain employees of The Chocolate and Confectionery Company
Pty Ltd T/A Ernest Hillier (the Respondent).
[2] On 15 April 2016 my associate was advised that the Respondent did not object to the
application.
[3] In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matters on the papers without
holding a hearing.
[4] On the basis of the material before me, including the statutory declaration of Mr D
Vroland of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent
Company and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the
Respondent Company, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the
proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.
[5] An order has been separately issued in PR579177.
| <Price code A, PR579179> |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
- AGLC
- Application by "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" Known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) [2016] FWC 2436
- Case
- [2016] FWC 2436
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court needed to determine whether the AMWU had met the statutory requirements to hold a protected action ballot. Specifically, the court had to decide if the union had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with the employer and if the necessary notification period under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act had been observed. The union had provided a statutory declaration from Mr D Vroland, affirming the union's efforts in bargaining with the employer and the steps taken to reach an agreement.
The Deputy President Gostencnik decided to rule on the matter without a hearing, as the employer did not object to the application. The Deputy President was satisfied that the AMWU had met the requirements under section 443(1) of the Fair Work Act, based on the evidence provided, including the statutory declaration from Mr Vroland. The Deputy President concluded that the union had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement and that the notification time for the proposed agreement had been met.
The Fair Work Commission issued an order separately in PR579177, permitting the AMWU to proceed with the protected action ballot for its members at The Chocolate and Confectionery Company. This decision allowed the union to move forward with the ballot to seek support from its members for potential industrial action.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.