Applicant S20-2002
Case
•
[2002] HCATrans 45
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Applicant S20-2002 [2002] HCATrans 45
[2002] HCATrans 45
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by Applicant S20-2002 for leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. The application was heard by Gummow J in chambers.
The central legal issue before Gummow J was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. This involved an assessment of whether the case raised a question of law that was of general public importance, or whether it was otherwise in the interests of the administration of justice that the High Court grant leave.
Gummow J considered the applicant's submissions and the relevant legal criteria for granting special leave. The judge's reasoning focused on the threshold requirements for appellate intervention by the High Court, particularly in circumstances where the applicant sought to challenge a decision of a lower court.
The application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.
The central legal issue before Gummow J was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. This involved an assessment of whether the case raised a question of law that was of general public importance, or whether it was otherwise in the interests of the administration of justice that the High Court grant leave.
Gummow J considered the applicant's submissions and the relevant legal criteria for granting special leave. The judge's reasoning focused on the threshold requirements for appellate intervention by the High Court, particularly in circumstances where the applicant sought to challenge a decision of a lower court.
The application for special leave to appeal was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Applicant S20-2002 [2002] HCATrans 45
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0