Antuma and Orlov
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1564
•11 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Antuma and Orlov [2017] FCCA 1564
[2017] FCCA 1564
11 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Antuma and Orlov*, heard before Judge Altobelli, the dispute concerned parenting arrangements for a child born in 2015. The proceedings involved applications by the parties regarding the child's residence, parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of contact between the child and the respondent father.
The court was required to determine the most appropriate parenting orders, considering the welfare and best interests of the child. Key issues included whether the mother should have sole parental responsibility, with whom the child should live, and the conditions under which the child should spend time with the father, including the necessity and nature of supervised contact.
Judge Altobelli ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the child and that the child live with the mother. The court further ordered that the father arrange for supervised contact with the child through a contact centre, with the father to bear the reasonable costs of this supervision. Pending the availability of a place at a specific contact centre, the father was to have supervised contact for two hours each alternate week with an independent provider, at his expense. Liberty was granted to the Independent Children’s Lawyer to relist the matter on short notice if circumstances warranted.
The court was required to determine the most appropriate parenting orders, considering the welfare and best interests of the child. Key issues included whether the mother should have sole parental responsibility, with whom the child should live, and the conditions under which the child should spend time with the father, including the necessity and nature of supervised contact.
Judge Altobelli ordered that the mother have sole parental responsibility for the child and that the child live with the mother. The court further ordered that the father arrange for supervised contact with the child through a contact centre, with the father to bear the reasonable costs of this supervision. Pending the availability of a place at a specific contact centre, the father was to have supervised contact for two hours each alternate week with an independent provider, at his expense. Liberty was granted to the Independent Children’s Lawyer to relist the matter on short notice if circumstances warranted.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Antuma and Orlov [2017] FCCA 1564
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
MRR v GR
[2010] HCA 4
Salah & Salah
[2016] FamCAFC 100
SS & AH
[2010] FamCAFC 13