Anthony and Thomas (No 2)

In *Anthony and Thomas (No 2)*, the wife sought to have a financial agreement, entered into by the parties in 2008, set aside. The husband opposed this application. The matter came before Watts J of the Family Court of Australia.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the wife had established grounds to set aside the 2008 financial agreement. Specifically, the court was required to consider whether the agreement was voidable due to the husband's alleged misrepresentation or non-disclosure of financial information, or whether it was otherwise unenforceable.

Watts J dismissed the wife's application. The reasoning for this decision is not detailed in the provided extract, but the outcome indicates that the wife failed to satisfy the court that the financial agreement should be set aside. The court reserved the husband's costs of the hearing.