Annual Wage Review 2017–18

Case [2017] FWC 4403


[2017] FWC 4403
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT


Fair Work Act 2009

s.285—Annual wage reviews to be conducted

Annual Wage Review 2017–18
(C2018/1)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

    MELBOURNE, 25 AUGUST 2017

VIEWS ON A PRELIMINARY HEARING — BUDGET STANDARDS RESEARCH

[1] On Friday 11 August 2017, a Statement was issued on the draft timetable for the Annual Wage Review 2017–18 that made reference to a project being undertaken which may provide data on contemporary budget standards. 1

[2] The Statement noted that ‘[i]n the event that these contemporary budget standards are published, the Panel will consider having a preliminary hearing on their outcomes. Interested parties will be informed of the Panel’s intentions in this regard.’ 2

[3] On Wednesday 23 August 2017 the anticipated report was published entitled ‘New Minimum Income for Healthy Living Budget Standards for Low-Paid and Unemployed Australians’ by Peter Saunders and Megan Bedford. A summary report was also published.

[4] Parties are invited to give consideration to this report and provide comment on the utility of holding a preliminary hearing to discuss the outcomes of this research. Parties that support a preliminary hearing are also asked to indicate the issues they propose be addressed at such a hearing.

[5] Submissions should be made by close of business Friday 8 September 2017 and can be filed electronically at awr@fwc.gov.au. Parties will have until close of business Friday 15 September to make submissions in reply.

[6] All submissions will be posted to the Commission’s website.

PRESIDENT

 1   [2017] FWC 4441 at [2].

 2   [2017] FWC 4441 at [3].

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR595572 >

Details
AGLC
Annual Wage Review 2017–18 [2017] FWC 4403
Case
[2017] FWC 4403
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Annual Wage Review 2017–18 was conducted by the Fair Work Commission (FWC) under the Fair Work Act 2009. The review pertained to a draft timetable for the annual wage review and the potential use of new data on budget standards. The report "New Minimum Income for Healthy Living Budget Standards for Low-Paid and Unemployed Australians" by Peter Saunders and Megan Bedford was anticipated and subsequently published on 23 August 2017. The FWC invited interested parties to comment on whether a preliminary hearing should be held to discuss the outcomes of this research, and if so, what issues should be addressed. Submissions were due by 8 September 2017, with replies accepted until 15 September 2017.

The legal issues before the Commission were whether a preliminary hearing should be conducted to consider the new budget standards report and, if so, what specific issues should be addressed during such a hearing. The FWC needed to determine if the new budget standards would provide valuable insights into the living conditions of low-paid and unemployed Australians and how these insights could inform the wage review process. The Commission also needed to establish a process for interested parties to voice their opinions and suggestions regarding the preliminary hearing.

In deciding to invite submissions from interested parties, the FWC aimed to ensure a transparent and inclusive process. The Commission recognised the potential significance of the new budget standards report in understanding the economic realities faced by low-paid and unemployed Australians. By seeking input on the need for a preliminary hearing and the issues to be addressed, the FWC aimed to incorporate a broad range of perspectives into its decision-making process. The decision to post all submissions on the Commission’s website further ensured transparency and allowed for public scrutiny and feedback.

The Commission set a deadline for initial submissions by 8 September 2017, with replies accepted until 15 September 2017. This timeframe provided interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to review the report, formulate their views, and engage in the process. The final outcome of the review, including any decisions on holding a preliminary hearing and the specific issues to be discussed, would depend on the submissions received and the Commission's subsequent deliberations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.