Annette Helen Dryden v Katrina Bowditch

Annette Helen Dryden sued Katrina Bowditch for damages resulting from an attack by Bowditch's dog. Dryden suffered a laceration to her right eyelid, an injury to her tear duct, and a laceration to her right forearm, which caused scarring. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of South Australia. Bowditch did not dispute liability for the injuries and the court therefore did not need to address any issues of principle.

The court considered the extent of Dryden's injuries, their impact on her life, and the medical treatment she required. The court noted that Dryden's injuries were significant and would have a long-term impact on her life. The court also considered the costs of Dryden's medical treatment and the lost wages she incurred as a result of the attack.

The court awarded Dryden damages of $60,238.83 and ordered Bowditch to pay Dryden's costs. The court found that the amount awarded was appropriate to compensate Dryden for her injuries and the impact they had on her life. The court also found that Bowditch should bear the costs of the proceedings as she was liable for the attack.

The court made an order for judgment to be entered for Dryden in the amount of $60,238.83 and for Bowditch to pay Dryden's costs.