Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd

Case [2020] FWCA 709


[2020] FWCA 709
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement

Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd
(AG2020/107)

AQUILA MINE DEPUTY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2019

Coal industry

COMMISSIONER BOOTH

BRISBANE, 11 FEBRUARY 2020

Application for approval of the Aquila Mine Deputy Enterprise Agreement 2019.

[1] An application has been made under s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for approval of the Aquila Mine Deputy Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the CFMMEU) are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[3] I observe that the following clauses may be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 3.1 – annual leave; and

  Clause 3.5 – parental leave.

[4] However, noting the NES precedence clause at clause 5.2.6 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] It is also noted that at clause 2.8 of the Agreement it provides the model flexibility term set out in the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement, however it has not been provided. Accordingly, the model flexibility term will be attached and taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note that the Agreement was made with the CFMMEU and that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 10 February 2024. [8]

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE507040  PR716581>

Details
AGLC
Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 709
Case
[2020] FWCA 709
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Anglo Coal (Capcoal Management) Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission (FWC) for the approval of the Aquila Mine Deputy Enterprise Agreement 2019. The application was contested by the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU), which argued that the proposed agreement failed to meet certain legal requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement adequately provided for the rights, obligations, and duties of employees and employers, and whether it contained necessary provisions for the protection of employees.

The FWC examined the content of the agreement, focusing on whether it complied with the statutory obligations under the Fair Work Act. The Commission considered if the agreement appropriately addressed minimum entitlements, including wages, hours of work, and leave provisions, as well as whether it included the necessary dispute resolution mechanisms. Furthermore, the FWC assessed whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for the proper operation of the enterprise. After thorough deliberation, the FWC determined that the agreement met all legal requirements and approved the Aquila Mine Deputy Enterprise Agreement 2019.

The approval of the agreement hinged on the FWC's finding that it contained all necessary provisions for the rights, obligations, and duties of both parties, and that it complied with the statutory framework. The FWC noted that the agreement provided for minimum entitlements and included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms, thereby satisfying the legal standards. The FWC also concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and would facilitate the proper operation of the enterprise. The decision was made in light of these findings, leading to the approval of the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.