Anestis and Klemm (No.2)

This matter came before Judge Young concerning proceedings involving Anestis and Klemm (No.2). The dispute involved applications for leave to access court documents, orders for supervised drug testing of the mother, an injunction restraining the mother from consuming illicit substances, and the dismissal of an objection to a subpoena concerning material about the mother's father, Mr Anestis.

The court was required to determine whether to grant leave for legal representatives to obtain copies of court documents, including sensitive material. It also had to consider whether to order supervised random urine analysis drug testing for the mother and grant an injunction prohibiting her from using illicit substances while the child was in her care. Furthermore, the court needed to rule on an objection to a subpoena seeking information about Mr Anestis and determine the conditions under which material produced by the South Australia Police pursuant to a subpoena could be inspected and copied.

Judge Young granted leave for legal representatives to have copies of all court documents, including section 69ZW and subpoena material. The mother was ordered to undergo supervised random urine analysis drug testing on no more than one occasion per month, with results to be provided promptly and collected according to the specified chain of custody protocol. An injunction was granted restraining the mother from consuming or being under the influence of illicit substances while the child was in her care. The objection to the subpoena concerning Mr Anestis was dismissed. Leave was granted for parties and their legal representatives, along with the Independent Children's Lawyer, family consultant, and family report writer, to inspect and copy material produced by the South Australia Police, with specific exceptions for confidential information and a condition that all copies be destroyed at the conclusion of the matter. The court also stipulated that any material produced pursuant to a subpoena intended to be relied upon must be presented by way of affidavit, with specific requirements for its content, annexation, pagination, and indexing. The matter was adjourned for further consideration.