| [2025] FWCA 1311 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ananda Marga Education Ltd Trading AS The River School
(AG2025/836)
THE RIVER SCHOOL COLLECTIVE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Educational services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON | BRISBANE, 28 APRIL 2025 |
Application for approval of The River School Collective Enterprise Agreement 2024
This decision deals with an application made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the The River School Collective Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Ananda Marga Education Ltd T/A The River School (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Notice of Employee Representational Rights
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to be the pre-June 2023 version. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]
Reasonable Foreseeability
Correspondence was sent to the Employer by my Chambers on 4 April 2025 raising a number of concerns including that the Agreement:
· Is silent in respect of weekend penalties for Gardeners;
· Provides inferior annual leave loading for shiftworkers; and
· Is silent in respect of sleepover, on call, recall, tool, protective clothing and uniform allowances for General Staff.
The Applicant responded on 8 April 2025 advising that:
· Gardeners are never required to work on a weekend;
· The school does not employ any shiftworkers; and
· General Staff are not required to sleepover, work on call or be recalled to duty. Further they are provided with all required tools and protective clothing and are not required to wear a uniform.
I am consequently satisfied that per s. 193A(6A) of the Act the circumstances for which these matters may be a detriment are not reasonably foreseeable for the purposes of s.193A(6) of the Act and the better off overall test. I note that should this change that pursuant to s.227A of the Act, application may be made for the future reconsideration of whether the agreement passes the BOOT during the life of the Agreement.
Obvious errors, defects or irregularities
The Commission noted that the Agreement appears to contain an incorrect reference to another clause at S4.13. When raised with the Applicant, the Applicant contended that the incorrect reference arose when drafting the clause on the basis of the relevant Award term and provided the correct reference. Further, the Applicant also contends that there is a second error in the Wage Schedule for the Office staff and provided an amendment that results in those employees affected being paid a high rate of pay. The Applicant asserts both of those are obvious errors, defects or irregularities. The Applicant has provided an updated copy of the Agreement which corrected these errors. I am satisfied that these issues each constitute an obvious error, defect, or irregularity and I will amend the Agreement accordingly pursuant to s.218A of the Act.
The Agreement contains a term at clause 4.5 that deals with deductions for overpayment from an employee’s fortnightly wage. I note that where such a deduction does not comply with s.324 of the Act, it may be unenforceable.
Undertakings
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Coverage
The Independent Education Union of Australia Queensland and Northern Territory Branch (IEUQNT) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the IEUQNT.
Approval
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].
[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE528725 PR786290>
- AGLC
- Ananda Marga Education Ltd Trading AS The River School [2025] FWCA 1311
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1311
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the agreement provided for appropriate minimum entitlements as mandated by the Fair Work Act, including considerations such as the rate of pay, leave entitlements, and other conditions of employment. Additionally, the court considered whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements of the Act, including the proper representation of the parties involved and the negotiation process. The court also reviewed whether the agreement contained any provisions that were contrary to public policy or could potentially lead to an unfair disadvantage for employees.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement provided for appropriate minimum entitlements and complied with the procedural requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it met the necessary standards for fairness and compliance with the law. The Commission also considered the broader context of the agreement, including the needs of the parties involved and the potential impact on the workforce. The Commission concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and the employer, and therefore granted approval.
The Fair Work Commission approved the 2024 Collective Enterprise Agreement, setting out the terms and conditions of employment for the employees of The River School. The Commission's decision recognised the agreement as fair and compliant with the legal standards required under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.