| [2014] FWCA 7723 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Amtel Pty Ltd T/A Stramit Building Products
(AG2014/7868)
STRAMIT BUILDING PRODUCTS MADDINGTON ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT WATSON | MELBOURNE, 31 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Stramit Building Products Maddington Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Stramit Building Products Maddington Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Amtel Pty Ltd T/A Stramit Building Products. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 7 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410910 PR557227>
- AGLC
- Amtel Pty Ltd T/A Stramit Building Products [2014] FWCA 7723
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7723
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was made in good faith and without coercion. The court had to assess if the agreement contained all the mandated terms and conditions, if it was fairly negotiated, and if it adhered to the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements.
The Fair Work Commission found that the Stramit Building Products Maddington Enterprise Agreement 2014 was compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009. The court determined that the agreement was made in good faith and without coercion, and it contained all the necessary terms and conditions. The commission approved the agreement, emphasising the importance of ensuring fair and balanced negotiations between employers and employees. This decision upheld the agreement and allowed it to take effect as intended by the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.