Ample and Kingston
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 1369
•21 August 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ample and Kingston [2007] FamCA 1369
[2007] FamCA 1369
21 August 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Ample and Kingston*, Bennett J of the Family Court of Australia considered a dispute concerning the parentage and welfare of two children, S and L. The proceedings involved an application by the mother to have the father declared the legal father of the children and to make orders regarding their living arrangements, communication, and international travel.
The court was required to determine whether to declare the father as the legal father of the children pursuant to section 69VA of the *Family Law Act 1975*. Further issues included authorising the mother to amend the child L's birth certificate to include the father's details without his consent, establishing the children's primary residence with the mother and granting her sole responsibility for major long-term decisions, and defining the father's communication rights with the children. The court also had to consider orders restricting the children's removal from Tasmania and Australia, and the father's liability for costs.
Bennett J declared the father to be the legal father of both children. The court authorised the mother to amend L's birth certificate to include the father's details, notwithstanding the absence of his consent. Orders were made for the children to live with the mother, who was granted sole responsibility for major long-term decisions. The father was granted specific communication rights, including letters, cards, photographs, and a weekly telephone call, with provisions for suspension and alternative arrangements. The court also made orders preventing the removal of the children from Tasmania and Australia without consent or further order, and placed their names on an Airport Watch List. The father was ordered to pay a portion of the mother's costs. Liberty was reserved for the father to apply to vary or set aside the parentage declaration within 30 days of service.
The court was required to determine whether to declare the father as the legal father of the children pursuant to section 69VA of the *Family Law Act 1975*. Further issues included authorising the mother to amend the child L's birth certificate to include the father's details without his consent, establishing the children's primary residence with the mother and granting her sole responsibility for major long-term decisions, and defining the father's communication rights with the children. The court also had to consider orders restricting the children's removal from Tasmania and Australia, and the father's liability for costs.
Bennett J declared the father to be the legal father of both children. The court authorised the mother to amend L's birth certificate to include the father's details, notwithstanding the absence of his consent. Orders were made for the children to live with the mother, who was granted sole responsibility for major long-term decisions. The father was granted specific communication rights, including letters, cards, photographs, and a weekly telephone call, with provisions for suspension and alternative arrangements. The court also made orders preventing the removal of the children from Tasmania and Australia without consent or further order, and placed their names on an Airport Watch List. The father was ordered to pay a portion of the mother's costs. Liberty was reserved for the father to apply to vary or set aside the parentage declaration within 30 days of service.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Consent
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Ample and Kingston [2007] FamCA 1369
Cases Citing This Decision
0