AMP Life Ltd v AMP Capital Funds Management Ltd
Case
•
[2016] NSWCA 176
•26 July 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
AMP Life Ltd v AMP Capital Funds Management Ltd [2016] NSWCA 176
[2016] NSWCA 176
26 July 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AMP Life Ltd (the appellant) and AMP Capital Funds Management Ltd (the first respondent) were parties to a dispute concerning the voting rights of a responsible entity at a meeting of members of a registered managed investment scheme. The matter came before the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the proper construction of section 253E of the *Corporations Act 2001* (Cth). Specifically, the Court had to determine whether an entity that is part of the group described as "the responsible entity and its associates" is precluded from voting on a resolution before a meeting of members only if that specific entity, rather than another member of that group, holds a non-member interest in the matter. A secondary issue concerned the application of the "testator's fault" analogy to the award of costs on appeal, a question of statutory construction.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. It reasoned that the prohibition in section 253E(2) on voting by "the responsible entity and its associates" applies to any member of that group if any member of that group has a non-member interest in the matter. The Court found that the analogy to "testator's fault" in probate proceedings was not applicable to the award of costs on appeal in this instance.
Consequently, the Court ordered that the first respondent be indemnified for its costs of the appeal from the assets of the AMP Capital China Growth Fund, and that the appellant pay the second respondent's costs of the appeal.
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was the proper construction of section 253E of the *Corporations Act 2001* (Cth). Specifically, the Court had to determine whether an entity that is part of the group described as "the responsible entity and its associates" is precluded from voting on a resolution before a meeting of members only if that specific entity, rather than another member of that group, holds a non-member interest in the matter. A secondary issue concerned the application of the "testator's fault" analogy to the award of costs on appeal, a question of statutory construction.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. It reasoned that the prohibition in section 253E(2) on voting by "the responsible entity and its associates" applies to any member of that group if any member of that group has a non-member interest in the matter. The Court found that the analogy to "testator's fault" in probate proceedings was not applicable to the award of costs on appeal in this instance.
Consequently, the Court ordered that the first respondent be indemnified for its costs of the appeal from the assets of the AMP Capital China Growth Fund, and that the appellant pay the second respondent's costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Statutory Construction
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Fiduciary Duty
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
In the matter of Asia Pacific Data Centre Limited [2018] NSWSC 1375
Cases Citing This Decision
4
In the matter of Asia Pacific Data Centre Limited
[2018] NSWSC 1375
In the matter of Asia Pacific Data Centre Limited
[2018] NSWSC 1375
In the matter of Asia Pacific Data Centre Limited
[2018] NSWSC 1375
Cases Cited
18
Statutory Material Cited
6
In the matter of AMP Capital Funds Management Limited (in its capacity as responsible entity of the AMP Capital China Growth Fund (ARSN 122 303 744))
[2016] NSWSC 986
Southern Wine Corporation Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Perera
[2006] WASCA 275
Southern Wine Corporation Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Perera
[2006] WASCA 275