Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 4 November 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 242


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 4 NOVEMBER 2015

AMENDED LISTS FOR HOBART AND LAUNCESTON

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
4.15 p.m.
For Judgment
The Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Derek Michael Crosswell, Jay John Bradford and David Ian Charles Coles

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Samuel Alfred Watterson

(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Samuel David William Maple

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers

10:00am
For Interlocutory Application by video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Property Consultants Counsel Pty Ltd v Mowbray Golf Club Inc

12:00 noon
For Interlocutory Application by video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Adrian Lacroix v Chantelle Lacroix

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
John Benjamin Adams

4:15pm For Sentence
Bryce Anderson Woodward

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00am
For Interlocutory Application by video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Property Consultants Counsel Pty Ltd v Mowbray Golf Club Inc

12:00 noon
For Interlocutory Application by video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Adrian Lacroix v Chantelle Lacroix

2:15pm
For Hearing
Vos Construction and Joinery Pty Ltd v Greg Anthony Norton-Smith

BURNIE
No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 4 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 242
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 242
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 4 November 2015, the Supreme Court of Tasmania published its amended law lists for Hobart and Launceston. In Hobart, the Court of Criminal Appeal heard an appeal against the judgment of Derek Michael Crosswell, Jay John Bradford, and David Ian Charles Coles at 4:15 p.m. In the same city, Justice Tennent presided over the criminal jurisdiction at 10 a.m. for the trial of Samuel Alfred Watterson, and at 4 p.m. for a bail application by Samuel David William Maple. In Launceston, Justice Porter presided over the criminal jurisdiction at 10 a.m. for the trial of John Benjamin Adams, and at 4:15 p.m. for the sentencing of Bryce Anderson Woodward. Justice Pearce presided over civil jurisdiction in both cities for interlocutory applications by video link at 10 a.m. and 12 noon.

The legal issues before the court were varied, including criminal trials, bail applications, and interlocutory applications in civil cases. The court of criminal appeal heard an appeal against judgment, while the criminal jurisdiction dealt with the trial and sentencing of defendants. The civil jurisdiction heard interlocutory applications that involved complex legal and factual issues requiring judicial intervention before the final determination of the cases.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the amended law lists, as they were not yet determined at the time of publication. The court was expected to deliver its judgments and orders on the respective matters as per the schedule. The final orders of the court will be published separately in due course.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.