Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 August 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 13 AUGUST 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Nathan Bush

For Bail Consent
TJP
Darren Leigh White

For Trial
Katrina Anne Chatters
Stacie Anne Dwyer
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Plea in Mitigation
JLF

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The State of Tasmania
v
Annette Treloar

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae and Partners and Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm for Directions Hearing by Video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
David Ronald Morgan

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves the Supreme Court of Tasmania’s amended law lists for Wednesday, 13 August 2014. The proceedings are spread across sessions in Launceston, Hobart, and Burnie, with both criminal and civil cases featured. Among the listed cases are bail applications, part-heard trials, and hearings related to specific civil matters. The parties involved range from individuals facing criminal charges to corporations engaged in civil litigation.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide include the granting of bail for certain defendants, the continuation of trials for ongoing criminal cases, and the adjudication of civil disputes. The court was tasked with assessing the merits of bail applications, determining the admissibility of evidence in ongoing trials, and resolving the civil disputes brought before it. Additionally, the court needed to address procedural matters such as directions hearings and plea in mitigation.

In its reasoning, the court considered the relevant legal principles applicable to each case. For criminal cases, the court evaluated factors such as the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the seriousness of the offence, and any potential risk to the community. For civil matters, the court focused on the legal arguments presented by the parties and the evidence provided. The court also ensured that procedural requirements were met, particularly in the context of ongoing trials and bail applications. The outcome of the court's decisions would depend on the specifics of each case, with the court aiming to deliver just and fair outcomes in line with the law.

The final orders would be specific to each case, reflecting the court's decisions on matters such as bail, the continuation of trials, and the resolution of civil disputes. The court's orders would be communicated to the parties involved, and any necessary actions or further proceedings would be outlined in the court's written judgments.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 August 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established