Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 10 September 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Aaron James Irwin
Luke Andrew Irwin

For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Application to Correct Sentence
Timothy Laurance Rozynski

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Nathan Robert Griffith

For Trial
Christie-Lee Margaret Shaw
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Stay Application
Duncan McPherson
v
Housing Tasmania

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Brian Silvia and Peter Krejci in their capacity
as joint and several deed administrators of FEA Plantations Ltd
and Forest Enterprises Australia Ltd
v
Thomas Curtain in his capacity as trustee for the Banyan Superannuation Fund

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15pm For Sentence
Rodney James McDonald
Ricky Lee Badcock

4:15pm For Sentence
Kurt Douglas Brimfield

For Further Submissions
Cameron James Brasher

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Mark Christopher Bramich
Tara Jayne Stokes
Joel Anthony Tucker
Stephen Matthew Biggs
Matthew Brian Williams

For Plea
Andrew Michael Richardson

2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Adam James Orme

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Nicholas Mark Anderson

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, various criminal and civil cases are scheduled for different sessions across multiple locations. In the Hobart court, several criminal cases are listed, including trials for Aaron James Irwin, Luke Andrew Irwin, and others, as well as applications and mentions for various defendants. There is also a civil stay application involving Duncan McPherson and Housing Tasmania. Launceston and Burnie courts have their own set of criminal cases scheduled for sentence and mention. Each session is presided over by different justices, highlighting the court's active engagement with both criminal and civil matters.

The legal issues addressed in these sessions range from the adjudication of criminal trials to the resolution of civil stay applications. In the criminal cases, the court must determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants based on the presented evidence and legal arguments. For civil matters, the primary focus is on whether the stay application should proceed or be dismissed. Each case involves intricate legal considerations, including the interpretation of relevant laws, the admissibility of evidence, and the application of legal precedents.

The court's reasoning in these matters is rooted in established legal principles and case law. Justices must meticulously evaluate the evidence, consider the submissions from both parties, and apply the appropriate legal standards. The outcomes of these cases will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. In the criminal cases, the court's decisions will determine the defendants' fates, while the civil stay application will impact the progression of the underlying proceedings. The judges' decisions reflect a careful balance of legal interpretation and procedural fairness.

The final orders will reflect the outcomes of the individual cases. In criminal trials, the court will deliver verdicts and potentially sentences. For civil applications, the court will either grant or deny the stay, thereby influencing the course of the litigation. These decisions are integral to the administration of justice, ensuring that both criminal and civil matters are handled with due process and legal precision.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 10 September 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established