Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 1 April 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 1 APRIL 2015

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
(Part Heard)
Denison Ong Chin Jui
Nicholas David McWilliams
Joseph Andrew Edwards

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar
Alhaji Ismail Kamara
Mohammad Bastoni
Michael Robert Underwood
Samuel William Murray Mulholland

For Plea
Christopher James Gerrard

For Plea in Mitigation
Christopher Paul Minehan

11:30 a.m.
For Mention
Ellen Irene Amy Tiller

For Plea
Richard Daniel Graham

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Robert John Christiaan Nieuwhof

For Sentence
Benjamin Michael Fama

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before JUSTICE TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Supreme Court, Cameron Street, Launceston
Mitchell John House (by his litigation guardian Rodney Craig House)
v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Stay Action
Water Industry Solutions Pty Ltd
v
Fenshaw Pty Ltd

Order to Show Cause
Fenshaw Pty Ltd
v
Water Industry Solutions Pty Ltd

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Marshall
v
Hendrick Brinkman t/a C2 Demolition and Anor

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Mackay Rural Pty Ltd and Ors
v
National Australia Bank

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Forest Enterprises Australia Limited (Administrators Appointed)
v
Atkins

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz

4.00pm For Bail Application
Sean Gregory Richardson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:00am For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Mitchell John House (by his litigation guardian Rodney Craig House)

v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Motor Accidents Insurance Board
v
Michael Geoffrey Lester and Ors

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Plea
Ricky John Izard
Amanda Jane Fazackerley

4:00pm For Plea
Justin Ryan Barnes

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Wednesday, 1 April 2015 include both criminal and civil matters. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases range from trials, mentions, pleas, and sentencing. Notably, there is a part-heard trial involving Denison Ong Chin Jui, Nicholas David McWilliams, and Joseph Andrew Edwards, and a bail application for Sean Gregory Richardson. On the civil side, there are directions hearings and stay actions, such as the Motor Accidents Insurance Board's case against Michael Geoffrey Lester and others. These lists reflect a busy court schedule with various legal proceedings scheduled throughout the day in both Hobart and Launceston.

The legal issues addressed in these cases encompass a range of criminal and civil matters. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court will need to determine the outcomes of ongoing trials, consider pleas from defendants, and address bail applications. For example, the trial of Denison Ong Chin Jui, Nicholas David McWilliams, and Joseph Andrew Edwards will require the court to evaluate evidence and apply the law to reach a verdict. Civil cases involve issues such as directions hearings, stay actions, and the resolution of disputes between parties. The court's decisions in these civil matters will hinge on the interpretation of contracts, the application of statutory provisions, and the resolution of disputes over property and damages.

The reasoning and outcome of these cases will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. In criminal cases, the court must apply the principles of criminal law and ensure that the rights of the accused are upheld while also considering the interests of justice. For civil matters, the court will rely on contract law, property law, and other relevant legal principles to resolve disputes. The outcomes will vary based on the evidence and arguments presented, but the court aims to provide just and timely resolutions to the legal issues at hand. Final orders will be issued following the court's deliberations and decisions on each case.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 1 April 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established