Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 8 December 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 269


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 8 DECEMBER 2015

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
RJB

2.30 pm
For Application
JCN

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Legal Argument (Part Heard)

Christina Vernessa Watson

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 8 December 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 269
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 269
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for Tuesday, 8 December 2015, detail the scheduled matters for the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The criminal division in Hobart has scheduled two cases: the first is for a plea hearing, which is set for 10:00 a.m. before Justice Pearce. The second matter, a jurisdictional application, is scheduled for 2:30 p.m. before the same justice. In the civil division, also in Hobart, miscellaneous civil business is to be heard at 9:30 a.m. before Justice Holt. In Launceston, there is a scheduled legal argument in a criminal case for 10:00 a.m. before Justice Porter. The case involves Christina Vernessa Watson, and the initials indicate that the publication of her name is restricted by law. There are no scheduled matters in Burnie.

The court was required to address the scheduling and allocation of cases within its jurisdiction. This includes determining the appropriate division for each matter, assigning a specific judge or justice to oversee the proceedings, and setting the time and date for the hearings. The court also needed to ensure that any legal restrictions on the publication of names were properly observed.

The court's reasoning and outcome reflect the meticulous planning required to manage a busy court schedule. The allocation of cases to specific divisions and judges ensures that each matter receives appropriate attention and expertise. The scheduling of hearings at specific times allows for efficient use of the court's resources and minimises delays for the parties involved. The court's adherence to legal restrictions on the publication of names demonstrates a commitment to privacy and confidentiality where required by law.

The final orders reflect the court's decision to proceed with the scheduled hearings as listed. The matters are to be heard by the specified judges at the designated times and locations, with due regard for any legal restrictions on the publication of names.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.