Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 21 October 2014 Summary

AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 21 OCTOBER 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to Court 2, Supreme Court, Cameron Street Launceston
Rodney David Synfield and Neil Raymond Graham
v
Senior Sergeant John Parker

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Adrian Raymond Nattey
Tanya Maree Devine

For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

1:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
Bail Consent
Frederick Edward Petrasek

For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:10pm For Trial (Part-Heard)
GCS

4.15pm For Bail Variation
Matthew James Coventry

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15am In Court as In Chambers For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court, 7 Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Rodney David Synfield and Neil Raymond Graham
v
Senior Sergeant John Parker

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Rodney David Synfield and Neil Raymond Graham brought a case against Senior Sergeant John Parker in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, heard via video-link from Launceston to Hobart. The nature of the dispute is not explicitly stated in the document but it is likely a civil matter given the mention of "Directions Hearing in Chambers." The case was presided over by Justice TENNENT and was scheduled for 9:15 a.m. on October 21, 2014.

The legal issues before the court involved procedural matters related to the directions hearing and possibly the admissibility or relevance of certain evidence or arguments presented by the parties. The court had to determine how to proceed with the hearing, especially considering the remote participation via video-link.

Justice TENNENT outlined the procedural steps that the parties needed to follow and ensured that the remote hearing would be conducted fairly and effectively. The outcome of the directions hearing would have guided the subsequent steps in the litigation process. Given the specific scheduling and procedural focus of this mention, it is likely that the court’s primary concern was to manage the logistics of the remote hearing rather than delve into substantive legal issues. The final orders would detail the procedural directives issued by the court to facilitate the smooth progress of the case.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 21 October 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established