SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 16 SEPTEMBER 2014
AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
BLH
Aaron James Irwin
Luke Andrew Irwin
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Application to Review a Suspended Sentence
BJC
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Matthew Kent Goodman
For Trial
David William Michaelson
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania
v
A Legal Practitioner
(Part Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Leigh Anthony Neil
4:15pm For Directions Hearing
Nicholas Charles Pitt
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Paul James Coppleman
V
Jessica Maree Godfrey
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Andrew Dennis Dare
Dylan Ray Webb
Madison Stuart Ansell
2:15 p.m. (not before 4:00 p.m.)
For Sentence
Peter Collins
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 16 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 191
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 191
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases encompass a variety of matters, including the review of a suspended sentence, trials in criminal cases, and civil disputes. The Supreme Court will need to address whether the suspended sentence should be reviewed and if so, under what conditions. The criminal trials will require the court to assess the evidence presented and determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants. In the civil case, the court must examine the allegations made by the Legal Profession Board and decide on the appropriate outcome based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties.
The Supreme Court's reasoning will be guided by relevant laws and precedents in each case. For the suspended sentence review, the court will consider the circumstances of the original sentencing and whether there are grounds for reconsideration. In the criminal trials, the court will apply the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt and assess the credibility of witnesses and the strength of the evidence. In the civil case, the court will apply principles of fairness and the applicable legal standards to determine the outcome. The court's decisions will be communicated in written judgments, providing detailed reasoning for each case.
The final orders of the court will depend on the outcomes of the hearings. In the criminal cases, the court may convict or acquit the defendants, and if convicted, may impose sentences as determined appropriate. In the suspended sentence review, the court may uphold, modify, or revoke the sentence. In the civil case, the court may find in favour of either the Legal Profession Board or the legal practitioner, depending on the evidence and legal arguments presented. The specific orders will be detailed in the court's written judgments, which will be available for review by the parties and the public.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.