SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 11 NOVEMBER 2014
AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
PKB
v
The State of Tasmania
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
West Coast Council
v
Warrick Coverdale, Valuer-General of the State of Tasmania
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
George Maryon
Shane Leslie Godfrey
For Decision
BJC
For Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
Darren Leigh White
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice HARPER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Timothy James Ellis
v
Kelly Cordwell
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 11 November 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court was required to decide are whether PKB's appeal against the State of Tasmania is valid, whether West Coast Council's appeal against Warrick Coverdale, Valuer-General of the State of Tasmania is valid, and the outcomes of the criminal and civil cases. The court also had to consider the sentence for George Maryon and Shane Leslie Godfrey, the plea in mitigation and sentence for Darren Leigh White, and the outcome of the civil case between Timothy James Ellis and Kelly Cordwell.
The court's reasoning and outcome is not provided in the text. However, the court was required to hear the appeals and cases and make decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented. The court may have considered legal principles and precedents in making its decisions.
No final orders are mentioned in the text. The court may have made orders in relation to the appeals and cases, but these are not provided.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.