Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 7 March 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 7 MARCH 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Mention

Gary Robert Greig

Adrian Lloyd Reardon

Darryl John Catlin

Mairi Margaret Carmel Barclay

For Trial

Nathan James Carins

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Trial
Ian Robert Cooksey

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
David James Oakley

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Joshua Daniel Wilson

12.00pm For Mention
Cameron James Riley
BBWF

For Plea by video-link
Kevin Lawrence Davenport

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Decision
Tamyka Lea Buchanan

10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Alan Arkinstall

Magistrates Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Associated Forest Holding Pty Ltd and Ors
V
Gordian Runoff Limited

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presented a series of criminal and civil cases for various sessions on Thursday, 7 March 2013. The cases ranged from mentions and trials to decisions, showcasing the court's diverse workload. The criminal cases were heard in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, while civil matters were managed in both Hobart and Launceston. Some hearings were conducted via video link, reflecting modern judicial practices to accommodate geographical constraints.

The legal issues involved in these cases encompassed a broad spectrum, including the handling of mentions, pleas, part-heard trials, and full trials. The court had to navigate through procedural aspects of criminal law, such as the management of cases under the Magistrates Court Act, and ensure that the rights of the accused were upheld while maintaining the integrity of the judicial process. Civil cases likely involved disputes over contractual obligations, property rights, and other civil matters requiring judicial intervention.

Justice Evans, Justice Blow, and Justice Wood presided over the cases in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie respectively. Their decisions would have been influenced by the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case. The court’s reasoning would have been detailed in its judgments, addressing the legal principles applicable to each situation. The outcomes would have varied based on the merits of each case, with the court delivering its verdicts and orders accordingly.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 7 March 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established