Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 25 July 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 134


AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 25 JULY 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Jacob David Martin

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Backstop Trial

ALC

For Mention

TLD

For Trial

Travis Leigh Frankcombe

Tamara Elizabeth Watts

Adrian David Barwick

(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence

Robin Francis James Woollacott

Matthew Justin Blackwell

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice PORTER

Criminal Jurisdiction

4.30 p.m.

For Sentence via video link to Court 2, Launceston

Brett Stewart Bonnitcha

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction


4.15 p.m.      

For Sentence via video link

Nicolas Alan James Lawton

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.

For Hearing- Oral Submissions

Blackley Investments Pty Ltd

v

Burnie City Council

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt

Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court

10.00am For Voir Dire (Part-Heard)

Stephen Roy Standage

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Associate Justice Holt by video-link from Court 2, Supreme Court, Hobart

Civil Jurisdiction

In Court As In Chambers

10.00am For Directions Hearing

Blackley Investments Pty Ltd   v.  Burnie City Council

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter by video-link from Court 7, Supreme Court, Hobart

Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court

4.30pm For Sentence

Brett Stewart Bonnitcha

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Bail Variation

Sally Anne Arnold

For Trial

Anthony Michael Mulkearns

(Part-Heard)

2:15 p.m.

For Legal Argument

Shane Robert Smith

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

4.15 p.m. For Sentence (by Video Link)

Nicolas Alan James Lawton

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 25 July 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 134
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 134
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for Thursday, 25 July 2013, include several cases listed across various courts in Tasmania. Notable cases include criminal trials and sentences in both Hobart and Launceston, as well as a civil hearing in Launceston. The proceedings span across different judges and associate justices, each presiding over various criminal and civil matters. The schedule indicates the time and sometimes the location of the hearings, which range from voir dire and backstop trials to sentencing and hearings on oral submissions.

The legal issues in these cases encompass a range of criminal charges, including trials and sentences for various offences. Civil matters include disputes between private entities and local councils. Each case presents specific legal challenges and procedural requirements, necessitating the court's attention to both statutory and common law principles. The court must ensure that all legal standards are met, including the proper conduct of trials, the application of sentencing principles, and the resolution of civil disputes according to established legal frameworks.

The reasoning and outcome of each case will depend on the specific facts presented and the applicable law. The court's decisions will reflect a consideration of evidence, legal arguments, and the relevant legal principles. For instance, in criminal cases, the court will assess the prosecution's evidence against the defence's arguments, ensuring that the principles of natural justice and the rights of the accused are upheld. In civil matters, the court will consider the merits of the submissions and any relevant precedents to reach a just outcome. Each case will be resolved based on the merits and the law, with the court providing detailed judgments as necessary.

The final orders will be determined by the court's decisions on the specific issues presented in each case. These orders will reflect the outcome of the trials, hearings, and other legal proceedings, ensuring that justice is served according to the law. The detailed judgments and orders will be made available in accordance with legal protocols, providing clarity and finality to the cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.