SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR THURSDAY, 2 AUGUST 2012
AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART – JUSTICE PORTER
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Plea
RP
10.30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Jason Charles Dare
Michael Hopkinson
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10 am
For Trial
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Macuei Bona
Scott Brian Enslow
(part-heard)
4.15 p.m.
For Sentence
Kelly Raema Mundy
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11.30 a.m.
For Hearing
Trumbull-Ward
V
Michell & Anor
(Part heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tyler John Mayne
Matthew Wayne Leslie
4.15pm For Sentence
Travis John Rigby
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
David Terrence Applebee
10:00 am
For Mention
Darryl John Heard
Lyndon Ivan Douglas Grieve
Adrian Wayne Smillie
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Thursday, 2 August 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 144
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 144
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues encompass a variety of matters, including pleas, bail applications, ongoing and part-heard trials, and sentencing hearings in the criminal jurisdiction. The civil jurisdiction involves miscellaneous business, with some hearings conducted via video link, indicating a range of legal disputes from criminal offences to civil matters. The scheduling reflects the court's workload and the need to manage multiple cases efficiently.
The reasoning behind the scheduling would involve balancing the court's resources and the urgency or complexity of each case. Pleas and bail applications typically require prompt attention, while trials and sentencing can be scheduled based on the availability of judges, witnesses, and legal counsel. The use of video links for civil hearings in Launceston demonstrates an effort to accommodate parties in different locations, ensuring access to justice.
The final orders would reflect the outcomes of the hearings as they occur, including any sentences imposed, bail decisions, and resolutions in civil disputes. The court's approach to managing its caseload aims to ensure that justice is administered in a timely and effective manner, considering the diverse nature of the legal issues presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.