Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 20 October 2014 Summary

AMENDED SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR MONDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2014

AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Tanya Maree Devine
Adrian Raymond Nattey

For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Mention
Dwight Stanley Murtagh

For Facts and Sentence
Anthony Robert Hawkins

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Jason Noel Rowe

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Hayden Murray Saunders

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Frederick Edward Petrasek
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness

For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse
(Part-Heard)

4:15p.m.
For Sentence
MJM

JPG

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Hearing
Saunders and Ward Pty Ltd
v
Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Robin O’Hair as personal representative of the Estate of Daphne O’Hair
v
AMACA Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Alissa Margaret Moore
Mark Andrew Jenkins

To Follow For Trial
GCS

4:00pm For Sentence
PLT
DPG

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
4.15 pm
For Sentence (via video link from Court 8, Hobart)
Hayden Murray Saunders

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The listed cases for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 20 October 2014 include several criminal and civil proceedings. Among the criminal cases, Tanya Maree Devine and Adrian Raymond Nattey have a mention scheduled in the morning, while Dwight Stanley Murtagh is listed for bail consent. A part-heard trial involving Jamie Peter Smart and Rhys Louis Gardner is set for the afternoon, followed by sentencing for Anthony Robert Hawkins. In the Launceston court, Alissa Margaret Moore and Mark Andrew Jenkins have a morning mention, with a trial set to follow in the afternoon. Hayden Murray Saunders has a sentence hearing scheduled via video link from Burnie to Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to address in these cases include bail applications, the admissibility of evidence, and the determination of sentences. In the criminal proceedings, the court would need to consider the nature and seriousness of the offences, the circumstances of each case, and the legal principles relevant to bail, sentencing, and the administration of justice. In the civil proceedings, the court would need to consider the legal arguments presented by the parties, the relevant statutory provisions, and the applicable case law.

The reasoning and outcome of the court's decisions in these cases are not detailed in the provided information. However, it is likely that the court considered the evidence and arguments presented by the parties, applied the relevant legal principles, and made decisions based on the merits of each case. The final orders of the court, including any sentences or determinations of liability, would be communicated to the parties and recorded in the court's official records. It is important for lawyers to stay informed of the outcomes of these cases, as they may have implications for future cases and the development of the law in Tasmania.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Monday, 20 October 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established