Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 August 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 2 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
PML
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Determination
John Eugene Gay

Court 8, Salamanca Place,
Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1.45 p.m.
For Sentence

Rebecca Janice Maree Cordwell

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12.30 p.m.
Pre Trial Application
Quilliam
v
M & D Thorne Pty Ltd

2.15 p.m.
R414 Directions Hearing by telephone
Rangiawha & Anor
v
Ker & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Ivan James Quarrell
Rebecca Jane Fraser

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceeding Application
JWB

For Plea
Sally Anne Arnold

For Trial
Matthew Julian Foster
(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 August 2013, set out various cases to be heard across different locations and jurisdictions. These cases involve both criminal and civil matters, with some being preliminary hearings, trials, or sentencing. Among the cases listed, one notable case is a miscellaneous civil business proceeding in Court 3, Hobart, presided over by Associate Justice Holt, involving a pre-trial application between Quilliam and M & D Thorne Pty Ltd. Another case listed is a criminal trial in Burnie, presided over by Justice Pearce, involving preliminary proceedings and a part-heard trial of Sally Anne Arnold and Matthew Julian Foster.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide in these cases include the determination of the appropriate legal proceedings and the scheduling of trials, pleas, and sentencing. In the civil case between Quilliam and M & D Thorne Pty Ltd, the court had to decide on the pre-trial application and its implications for the case. In the criminal cases, the court had to schedule the trials, handle preliminary proceedings, and decide on the appropriate sentences for the accused.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case would be determined during the proceedings themselves. As these cases involve various stages of litigation, the outcomes would depend on the evidence presented, legal arguments made, and the court's interpretation of the law. In the civil case, the outcome would likely focus on the merits of the pre-trial application and its impact on the case's progression. In the criminal cases, the outcomes would depend on the evidence presented during the trials, the accused's pleas, and the court's determination of the appropriate sentences.

The final orders for each case would be determined during the proceedings and would depend on the outcomes of the court's decisions. The Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists provided a comprehensive overview of the cases to be heard on 2 August 2013, ensuring that all parties involved were aware of the schedule and could prepare accordingly.

Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 2 August 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established