Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 11 October 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 207


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2013
AMENDED LIST FOR BURNIE
HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Ruling
Nathan Grant Chatters

For Mention
Emma Lillian Rainbird

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link to Burnie
For Judgment
Tamas Kapitany
v
M & E Phelan

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Bail Application
Shadi Farhat

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
Via Video Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
Alexander Street

Before Justice WOOD by video link
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link to Burnie
For Judgment
Tamas Kapitany
v
M & E Phelan

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 11 October 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 207
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 207
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This document pertains to the amended law lists for Friday, 11 October 2013, in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, specifically for Burnie and Hobart. The lists outline the schedule for various court hearings including both criminal and civil matters. The proceedings for this day include rulings, mentions, judgments, and bail applications.

The legal issues addressed in this document include the administration of justice in both criminal and civil cases. For instance, there is a ruling for Nathan Grant Chatters, a mention for Emma Lillian Rainbird, and a bail application for Shadi Farhat. Additionally, the court is set to deliver a judgment in the case of Tamas Kapitany v M & E Phelan. The court's role is to ensure that the legal process is followed correctly and that justice is served in accordance with the law.

In this case, the court's reasoning and outcome are not detailed within the document. However, the presence of these listed cases suggests that the court is actively engaged in managing its caseload, addressing a variety of legal issues through scheduled hearings. The amended list indicates adjustments made to the original schedule, likely to accommodate the needs of the cases and the availability of the parties and legal representatives.

No final orders are mentioned in the document, as it primarily serves as a schedule and does not provide details of the court's decisions or judgments. The document's purpose is to inform the parties and legal representatives of the court's timetable and to ensure that all parties are prepared for their respective hearings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.