Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 9 May 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 401

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, WEDNESDAY, 9 MAY 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link 
Margaret Anne Otto

For Directions Hearing 
Haydon Dale Smith
Kenneth David Reynolds
Benjamin Leigh Higgins
Stuart Norton Woods

Brian Maxwell Barrett

Tyson Jack Montgomery
Paul Andrew Jackson

For Bail Consent
Jarrod Anthony McKenna
Aaron Campbell Brumley
Craig Andrew Leaman

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
James Laird Pulford
Justin Cleaver

For Mention
Daniel James Robertson
Witnesses

For Trial

Robert Michael Allen

(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Wade Richard Burgess

For Sentencing Submissions
Nathan John Garth
Zoe Elizabeth Rainbird

For Plea in Mitigation
Stephanie Louise Hay

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher David Eastley
Rianna Rochelle Lumley
DS

For Trial
Jesse Rick Littlejohn

4:15 p.m.

For Bail Application
Jye David Cowen

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Set Aside Statutory Demand
Cave Construction Pty Ltd
v
Tas Metal Curving & Fabrication Pty Ltd

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Barry Hansch
v
Pontville Homes Pty Ltd and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Directions Hearing by Video Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Corey Joseph Ford
Marcus Dennis Mayne
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald
Ian Rosewall
Brett Mathew Freeman

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Mark Anthony Carr
Corey Mitchell Gesler
Clinton Charles Wilson
John Benjamin Adams

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Dylan Mark Dennis Jenkins
TJL    
Danielle Alyce Saltmarsh
James Peter Sampson
James Frederick Edward Slevin
Melissa Joy Mace
Tina Maree Robertson
Renae Lorraine Donald
Rodney Eric Barker
DHR   
MP     
Jake Herlihy
Albert William George

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
KPM   
Mathew Stephen Fraser
Benjamin Fraser
SAT             

To Follow
For Bail Consent
TAT             
EAH             
Michael George Routledge
MJF             
Sammual Wilmot
Gavin Thomas Midson
Joseph Edward Auton
GAW  
MJW  

To Follow
For an Application
Keegan Bryan Pallier

To Follow
For Plea
Jonty Peter Smith
MJT             
Robert Oswen Tyler
Phillip James Standage

2:15pm For an Application
Amy Maree Harris v State of Tasmania

4:00pm For Sentence by Video Link to Ashely Youth Detention Centre
JLR    

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Wednesday, 9 May 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 401
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 401
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The law lists detail a range of criminal and civil matters to be heard across various courts in Tasmania on Wednesday, 9 May 2018. In the Supreme Court at Hobart, several defendants are scheduled for directions hearings, bail applications, and sentencing submissions. Some cases involve multiple defendants, such as the directions hearing for Haydon Dale Smith and others, while others are individual matters, like the directions hearing for Wade Richard Burgess. The Launceston Supreme Court has a number of defendants due for directions hearings via video link to Risdon Prison Complex, with some cases involving multiple defendants, such as the hearing for Corey Joseph Ford and others. The civil jurisdiction at Hobart has a statutory demand set aside matter and a directions hearing by telephone.

The court's primary task is to manage the scheduling and procedural aspects of these cases, ensuring that the defendants have appropriate legal representation and that the matters proceed in an orderly fashion. In the criminal cases, the court must address issues such as bail applications, plea entries, and sentencing, while in the civil case, the focus is on the procedural aspects of the statutory demand set aside.

The reasoning of the court is implicit in the scheduling and procedural instructions outlined in the law lists. The court ensures that each case is given the appropriate time and attention, with specific slots allocated for each matter. The outcome of these hearings will depend on the individual circumstances of each case, but the court's role is to facilitate the legal process and ensure that the rights of the defendants are upheld.

The final orders will be determined by the outcomes of the individual hearings and will be recorded in the court's official records. The law lists provide a clear overview of the court's agenda for the day, indicating the range of matters to be addressed and the procedural steps that will be taken.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.