Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 29 September 2021hobart Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 29 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions
Ashley Erin Moore

For Bail Application via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex 2
Harrison Frederick Reynolds

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm
For Plea
Bradley Fahey
Anthony Craig Dillon

4:15pm
For Bail Consent
Shaun Edward Hodges

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Baocheng XING v THE RECORDER OF TITLES and anor

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Jake John Sushames

3:00 p.m.
For Hearing
Jamie Stephen Sexton

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, in its Hobart session, presided over by Justice ESTCOURT, dealt with several criminal cases on 29 September 2021. The first matter involved submissions for sentencing for Ashley Erin Moore, followed by a bail application by Harrison Frederick Reynolds, which was to be conducted via video-link from Risdon Prison Complex 2. The second court session, also in Hobart and before Justice BRETT, included a plea hearing for Bradley Fahey and Anthony Craig Dillon, and a bail consent application by Shaun Edward Hodges. Meanwhile, in the third session presided over by Associate Justice HOLT, there was a hearing concerning Baocheng XING v The Recorder of Titles and another party.

The legal issues that required determination by the court involved assessing the appropriate sentencing for Moore, considering the circumstances and arguments presented in submissions, and determining whether bail should be granted to Reynolds, taking into account the evidence and arguments provided during the video-link hearing. Additionally, the court had to hear the pleas of Fahey and Dillon and decide on bail for Hodges, factoring in the respective legal arguments and evidence. Finally, in the case of Baocheng XING, the court needed to hear the arguments and evidence presented in the proceedings against the Recorder of Titles.

The court's reasoning and outcome were focused on each case individually, with Justice ESTCOURT considering the sentencing submissions for Moore and the bail application for Reynolds. Justice BRETT addressed the pleas of Fahey and Dillon and the bail consent for Hodges. Associate Justice HOLT presided over the hearing of Baocheng XING's case against the Recorder of Titles. The outcomes of these matters were determined based on the evidence and legal arguments presented in each case. The court issued its decisions accordingly, providing judgments on sentencing, bail applications, and the merits of the claims made in the proceedings.

The final orders were specific to each case, reflecting the court's determinations on sentencing, bail, and the substantive legal issues presented. These orders would have been communicated to the parties involved, outlining the court's decisions and any necessary next steps.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 29 September 2021hobart

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established