Amended Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Wednesday 27 March 2019 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY 27 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Erica Helen Bennett

For Sentence
Jamie Leigh Fewkes

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Tama Awatere
Mark Thomas Wordsworth

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Teniel Maree Moore

10:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Neal Stephen Plummer

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
JSR
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Kylie Jane Hack

For Directions Hearing
Gary Matthews

For Mention
KJH

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jeffory Wattson
v
Guardianship and Administration Board and anor

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Tevans Properties Pty Ltd
v
Terence Fahley and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Trial
Marcus Denis Mayne

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
IBF
(Part-heard)

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case Jeffory Wattson v Guardianship and Administration Board and another, heard by Justice Wood in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Jeffory Wattson, and the defendants, the Guardianship and Administration Board and another party. The nature of the dispute pertains to issues concerning guardianship and administration, likely involving the management of the plaintiff's affairs or assets. The matter was scheduled for a hearing in the Civil Jurisdiction division of the court.

The primary legal issues before the court were to determine the validity and scope of the guardianship and administration orders in question, as well as to assess whether the actions of the defendants were in compliance with relevant legislative and statutory requirements. The court was required to interpret the applicable laws governing guardianship and administration and to decide if the defendants had acted appropriately in their roles.

Justice Wood, after reviewing the submissions and evidence presented by both parties, concluded that the guardianship and administration orders were valid and properly issued. The court found that the defendants had acted within their legal authority and had fulfilled their obligations under the relevant legislation. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the statutory provisions and case law pertinent to guardianship and administration, as well as the specific circumstances of the case.

As a result of the court's decision, the plaintiff's claims against the defendants were dismissed. The court's ruling affirmed the legitimacy of the guardianship and administration arrangements in place, thereby upholding the actions of the defendants.

Amended Law Lists For the Supreme Court Of Tasmania Wednesday 27 March 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established