Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 31 August 2021 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY 31 AUGUST 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Samuel David William Maple
Aaron Thompson

For Directions Hearing
James Stuart Walker

For Trial
Daniel Robert Knowles

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
JMT
Damien Leslie Harper
JDC

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
MJD

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.30am
For mention by video-link to Ron Barwick Prison and Risdon Prison Complex
David Hau Moeakiola
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown
10.40am
For plea
CPDS
11am
For sentence
PJS

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Security For Costs
Digga Excavations Pty Ltd v Linear Capital Pty Ltd

For Mention
Darren John COLLINS and anor v DEVONPORT CITY COUNCIL

For Directions Hearing
Natalie Anne PRESHAW v Miroslaw Ryszard KUCHARSKI

For Directions Hearing
John Robert ANDERS v CALVARY HEALTH CARE TASMANIA LIMITED T/as CALVARY HEALTHCARE TASMANIA

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Faith Evelyn TKALAC v Coroner Simon COOPER
For Directions Hearing
STATE OF TASMANIA v Sarah BOLT, Anti-Discrimination Commissioner
For Directions Hearing
Michele Clare WILSON and anor v Betty Clare NAILER and anor

For Directions Hearing
Sharon Gaye JAMES-WOOD and anor v THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE as Executor of the Estate of David Malcolm Branch and anor

For Directions Hearing
Shelly Diana McINNES v Janet Anne ELDER as Executor of the Will of Margaret Joan Anderson and anor

For Directions Hearing
2:15p.m. via MS Teams
For Hearing
The Estate of the late Robert Allan SMITH

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Peter Richard Anderson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00am
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Isaac Jess Hall

4:00pm
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MJD

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Lee Anthony Shaw v Beverley Joyce Hanlon

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Tyson James Hayes

4:15pm
For Sentencing
Paul Andrew Bellchambers

For Directions Hearing
Shane Robert Reynolds

For Hearing
Thomas Joseph Gardam

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on Tuesday 31 August 2021 feature a range of civil and criminal cases across multiple locations in the state. The matters span bail applications, directions hearings, trials, and sentencing, showcasing the breadth of judicial activity in the Tasmanian legal system. The list includes cases involving both individuals and corporations, reflecting the court's role in resolving a variety of legal disputes.

The legal issues the court was required to decide varied significantly across the cases listed. In criminal matters, issues such as bail eligibility, disputed facts, and sentencing guidelines were central. In civil matters, disputes ranged from security for costs to executorship issues and anti-discrimination claims. The cases highlighted the need for judicial oversight in both the procedural and substantive aspects of the law, ensuring that both the rights of the accused and the protection of legal rights are upheld.

The court's reasoning and outcomes, while not detailed in the list, would have involved careful consideration of the evidence and legal principles relevant to each case. Justices and judges would have applied statutes, case law, and procedural rules to arrive at decisions that aimed to balance justice, fairness, and the rule of law. The outcomes would have addressed the specific legal issues raised in each case, providing resolutions that could be subject to appeal if either party disagreed with the court's findings.

Final orders and decisions would have been documented in the court's records, available for review by the parties involved and the public, maintaining transparency and accountability in the judicial process.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday 31 August 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established