Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 3 November 2020 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 3 NOVEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
J S F

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
J L H

For Sentencing Submissions
M S L

2:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court, 1 Burnie
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

For Sentence
B G M

3:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
K L H

4:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Teresa Anne Netz

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Robert Peter Matthewson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Brian Graham Dean Gordon

11.30am
For Bail Application via video-link to Hobart Reception Prison
Christopher John Howard

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Aaron Charles McShane
Nicholas John Barrett

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Shane Michael Emmerton

For Bail Application via video link Risdon Prison Complex
Aaron Pearson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Hearing
Elizabeth Jane Hope as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Lyndsay Hope and ors v George Papoutsakis and ors

For Hearing
Sarah Jane Scattergood v The Commonwealth of Australia

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Louise Mary Schmidtke v Karyn Louise Grueber as Executors of the Will of Joan Louise Smith and anor

For Directions Hearing
Leisha Jean Fuller v Larry Raymond Nunn as executor of the Will of the late Peter John Nunn

2:15pm
For Hearing
Carolyn Iris Clifford v Robert Raymond Clifford

For Hearing via Skype
Bianca Rock v John Soloduch

For Hearing via Skype
Denise Parker v Dr Stephen Wilkinson and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
SDH

For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Robert Peter Matthewson

For Bail Application
Cedric Harper Jordon
Noelene June Jordan

For Plea
Codie Ken Fazackerley

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Katrina Dianne Newitt
Michael Peter Lee James Blake

For Trial
Christopher Brenden Keil

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexandra Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
J L H

2:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

4:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
Teresa Anne Netz

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
SDH

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the amended law lists for Tuesday, 3 November 2020, included a range of criminal and civil cases scheduled for hearings in various locations across the state. In the criminal jurisdiction, several cases were set for directions hearings, bail applications, and sentencing submissions. The court lists also included a variety of civil cases, such as applications to vary bail, estate disputes, and personal injury claims.

The legal issues before the court varied from case to case but generally involved the interpretation and application of criminal and civil law. For instance, in criminal cases, the court had to determine whether bail should be granted or varied, whether a defendant was fit to stand trial, and what sentence should be imposed. In civil cases, the court had to resolve disputes over the interpretation of contracts, the distribution of estates, and the assessment of damages.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case would depend on the specific facts and legal issues involved. In criminal cases, the court had to consider factors such as the severity of the offence, the likelihood of reoffending, and the interests of the community. In civil cases, the court had to balance the competing interests of the parties and apply relevant legal principles to reach a just outcome.

The final orders of the court would depend on the outcome of each case. In criminal cases, the court could impose a range of penalties, including fines, imprisonment, or community service orders. In civil cases, the court could make a variety of orders, such as granting or varying an injunction, ordering the payment of damages, or declaring the rights of the parties.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 3 November 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established