Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 3 November 2020 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA TUESDAY 3 NOVEMBER 2020

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing
J S F

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
J L H

For Sentencing Submissions
M S L

2:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court, 1 Burnie
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

For Sentence
B G M

3:45 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
K L H

4:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Burnie
Teresa Anne Netz

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Nicholas John Barrett

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Robert Peter Matthewson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial
Brian Graham Dean Gordon

4:15pm
For Directions Hearing
Aaron Charles McShane

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Shane Michael Emmerton

For Bail Application via video link Risdon Prison Complex
Aaron Pearson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:30a.m.
For Hearing
Elizabeth Jane Hope as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Lyndsay Hope and ors v George Papoutsakis and ors

For Hearing
Sarah Jane Scattergood v The Commonwealth of Australia

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Louise Mary Schmidtke v Karyn Louise Grueber as Executors of the Will of Joan Louise Smith and anor

For Directions Hearing
Leisha Jean Fuller v Larry Raymond Nunn as executor of the Will of the late Peter John Nunn

2:15pm
For Hearing
Carolyn Iris Clifford v Robert Raymond Clifford

For Hearing via Skype
Bianca Rock v John Soloduch

For Hearing via Skype
Denise Parker v Dr Stephen Wilkinson and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
SDH

For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Robert Peter Matthewson

For Bail Application
Cedric Harper Jordon
Noelene June Jordan

For Plea
Codie Ken Fazackerley

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Katrina Dianne Newitt
Michael Peter Lee James Blake

For Trial
Christopher Brenden Keil

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexandra Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m but not before 2:15 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
J L H

2:15 p.m
For Bail Application via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

4:15 p.m
For Sentence via video-link to Court 8, Hobart
Teresa Anne Netz

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
SDH

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The amended law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania scheduled for 3 November 2020 feature a variety of criminal and civil cases across multiple locations, including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. The Hobart court is set to hear several criminal matters, including a bail application and sentencing submissions. Launceston will handle a trial, bail application, and directions hearings, while Burnie will address a bail application and sentencing submissions, all via video link. Additionally, there are civil hearings scheduled in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, involving disputes ranging from estate matters to personal injury claims.

The court was required to decide on various legal issues pertinent to each case, including the sufficiency of evidence for bail applications, the appropriate sentencing for convicted individuals, and the merits of various civil claims. For criminal cases, the court had to consider whether the prosecution had provided sufficient evidence to justify bail, whether the sentences proposed were commensurate with the severity of the crimes, and whether the defendants had any mitigating factors that should be taken into account. In civil cases, the court had to determine the validity of the claims made by the plaintiffs, the admissibility of evidence, and the legal principles applicable to each dispute.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case varied depending on the specifics of the matter. In criminal cases, the court evaluated the evidence presented and the legal arguments made by both the prosecution and the defence. The court also considered relevant case law and statutory provisions to ensure that the rights of the defendants were protected while upholding the principles of justice. In civil cases, the court examined the pleadings, evidence, and legal arguments to determine the merits of each claim and to ensure that justice was served in accordance with the law. The court provided detailed written reasons for its decisions, which were made public and available for review by the parties and legal practitioners.

The final orders of the court varied depending on the outcome of each case. In criminal cases, the court either granted or denied bail, imposed sentences, or set dates for further hearings. In civil cases, the court either dismissed the claims, ordered further evidence to be presented, or provided directions for the progression of the case. The orders were communicated to the parties and recorded in the court's registry for future reference.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Tuesday 3 November 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established