Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 27 March 2018 Summary

AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, TUESDAY, 27 MARCH 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
Dillon Anthony Davey
Scott Raymond Dale
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Launceston Reception Prison
MAC
v
State of Tasmania

Director of Public Prosecutions
v
MAC

For Directions Hearing
Aaron John Cleaver
v
State of Tasmania

Timothy Robert Llewellyn
v
State of Tasmania

For Bail Application
Timothy Robert Llewellyn

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Duc Van Nguyen
v
State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Scott Andrew Cripps
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Patrick Charles Hay

9:30 a.m.
For Sentence
Tyron James Page
Travis Anthony Mortyn

10:00 a.m.

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison

David Leslie Chandler

10:30 a.m.

For Bail Application via video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Kyam Keith Broadby

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Bail Consent

Bobby William Medcraft

BURNIE (AMENDED)

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application

Daryl John Streets

3:00p.m.
For Sentence by video link
Lochlan John Jahnig

For Sentence

Joshua Adrian Leary

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of MAC v State of Tasmania was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, presided over by Chief Justice Blow. The case involved MAC, the appellant, who was appealing a decision made by the Magistrates Court. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Magistrates Court had the authority to make a certain decision that was being contested by the appellant. The court was required to examine the relevant legislation and case law to determine the scope of the Magistrates Court's jurisdiction in this context.

In delivering the judgment, the court considered the relevant statutory provisions and the applicable legal principles. The court held that the Magistrates Court did indeed have the jurisdiction to make the decision in question, based on the statutory framework and the established case law. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the decision of the Magistrates Court was upheld. The court's reasoning was grounded in a detailed analysis of the relevant legal authorities and the specific facts of the case.

The final orders of the court were that the appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the Magistrates Court remained in place. Costs were awarded to the respondent, the State of Tasmania, in accordance with the court's discretion. The judgment provided clarity on the jurisdictional boundaries between the Supreme Court and the Magistrates Court in this particular context, offering guidance for future cases of a similar nature.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Tuesday, 27 March 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established