Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 30 June 2016 Summary

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 30 JUNE 2016

AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link to
Court 1, Launceston
Shadi Farhat

To Follow
Civil Jurisdiction
For Motion to Review by video link to
Court 1, Launceston
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and anor
v
Aaron Michael Marks

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing by video link
To Court 1, Launceston
Stuart Barry Russell
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link
To Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Melanie Jane Johnson

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link
To Risdon Prison Complex
Gaurav Endlay
Tristan Jacob Hinds

For Mention via video-link
To Mary Hutchinson’s Women Prison
Katie Ann Harrison

For Mention via video-link to
Rob Barwick Minimum Security Prison
William Henry Richardson
Richard Francis Clarke
Alan Noel Lesina

For Mention via video-link to
Hobart Reception Prison
Beverley Anne Banfield

For Mention via video-link to
Wilfred Lopes Centre and
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
JHS

For Mention
Benjamin Lee Noyes
Kevin Michael Phillips
Rebecca Rusterholz
Kenneth John Fisher
Kelly Raema Mundy-Page
DJT
Nicole Lee Sampey
JBH
Jarrod Fletcher

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
SJH
Daniel Jacob Hansen

For Bail Consent
Renee Ferguson
Edward Whyndham Gearman
Duc Van Nguyen
Mark James Rutherford
Samuel James Wall
Adrian Michael Flounders
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Daniel John Kirk
Emma May Wordsworth

For Bail Variation
Michelle Lee Arnott

For Sentence
Alle Sleman
Nazih Abbas

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT

Civil Jurisdiction

In Court as in Chambers

10:30 a.m.

For Hearing

A Legal Practitioner

Andrea Boxall and the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston

Miscellaneous Civil Business

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Liam Lawrence
v
Australiansuper Pty Ltd and anor

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Sharlene Brown and anor
v
Paul De Deuge and ors

4:45 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Alison Turner
v
Director of Inland Fisheries

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
DTB

Shadi Farhat
Mickheal Bechara
Bridgette Allen
Shane Mark Ivey
Harry Kourakis
Conniey Rea Riley
Aaron John Harvey
Jay Ashley Whatley
Coby Wells
Jake Wells
Troy Wayne Murray
LAP

To Follow

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Andrew Dickson
JDS
PDW

Brooke Alyce Andriuskevicius

To Follow

For Plea
Mathew Luke Williams
Jodi Dale Williams
Derek George Arnol
Ethen Wayne Nicholls
Luke Jack Walker
Dane Lindon Squires

To Follow
For Sentencing Submissions
Martin John Mace

Civil Jurisdiction
To Follow For Motion to Review by video link to Court 2, Hobart
Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and anor v Aaron Michael Marks

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Directions Hearing by video link to Court 7, Hobart
Stuart Barry Russell v State of Tasmania

4:30pm For Sentence
Jacob Adam Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Wood

9:15 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link from
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Melanie Jane Johnson

10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link from
Wilfred Lopes Centre
and Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

JHS

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The law lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Thursday, 30 June 2016, detail a series of criminal and civil cases scheduled for various courts across the state. The cases span from Launceston to Hobart and involve both video-link and telephone proceedings. Notable entries include a mention by video link for Shadi Farhat, a directions hearing for Senior Sergeant Luke Moore and another for Stuart Barry Russell against the State of Tasmania. Several individuals face sentencing, such as Melanie Jane Johnson and Jacob Adam Williams, while others have bail applications or variations pending.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide encompass a range of matters including preliminary proceedings applications, plea submissions, sentence submissions, and bail variations. The court was tasked with handling motions to review, directions hearings, and miscellaneous civil business, which likely involve interpreting legal precedents and statutes pertinent to each case. Additionally, the court needed to ensure compliance with procedural rules, particularly given the use of video-link and telephone technologies for some hearings, which may introduce unique logistical and evidentiary challenges.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided document, but the scheduling and nature of the cases suggest that each matter will be addressed according to the established legal protocols and judicial discretion. The Supreme Court of Tasmania, as the highest court in the state, would have exercised its authority to manage the proceedings effectively, ensuring that justice is served in each case. The use of video-link and telephone technologies indicates an adaptation to modern judicial processes, likely aimed at efficiency and accessibility, while maintaining the integrity of the court's proceedings.

The final orders, while not explicitly stated, would follow the court's decisions on each case, potentially including rulings on bail, sentencing, or procedural matters. Each outcome would be communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official documents.

Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 30 June 2016

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established