Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 22 March 2018

Case [2018] TASSCCourtlist 366


AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 22 MARCH 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Davey
Dillon Anthony Davey
Scott Raymond Dale
(Part Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Gavin Adrian Quirk
v
State of Tasmania

For Mention
Andrew David Gilley

4:15 p.m.
For Plea
Sally Ann Walters

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
DFP   
(Part-Heard)

For Trial
ES     
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Joshua Blair Read

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brocklands Pty Ltd
v
Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd
(Part-Heard)

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Plea and Sentence

Patrick Charles Hay

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Scott Davidson

4:15pm For Bail Application
Anthony Wayne Slade
James Sean Smithe

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention

Nathan Gregory Coppleman
Melinda Lee Batten

For Trial
Guy Jon Lorenz
Scott Phillip Strahan
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing

Nicholas Michael Butcher
v

Constable Jason Lyons and Anor

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence

Craig Michael McGrath
James Brendon Hardwick

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 22 March 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 366
Case
[2018] TASSCCourtlist 366
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The document lists various cases scheduled for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on 22 March 2018. The cases span both criminal and civil jurisdictions. Notable criminal cases include trials for Matthew John Davey, Dillon Anthony Davey, Scott Raymond Dale, and others. There are also mention, directions hearing, and plea cases listed. The civil jurisdiction includes a trial between Brocklands Pty Ltd and Tasmanian Networks Pty Ltd. Additionally, the document provides information on cases scheduled for Magistrates Court and mentions that lists for other courts can be requested.

The legal issues in these cases likely revolve around various criminal charges such as theft, assault, and drug-related offences, as well as civil disputes over contractual obligations or property rights. The specific legal issues would depend on the nature of the charges and the arguments presented by the parties involved. The court's role is to interpret the law, apply it to the facts of each case, and make a decision based on the evidence and submissions.

The court's reasoning and outcome for each case will be determined during the respective hearings. The judges will consider the evidence presented, apply relevant legal principles, and make findings of fact and law. The outcomes will depend on the strength of the evidence, the legal arguments, and the applicable laws. The document does not provide details on the court's decisions or outcomes for the listed cases, as these would be communicated during or after the hearings.

The final orders of the court for each case will be communicated after the respective hearings and will depend on the findings and decisions made by the judges. The orders may include convictions, sentences, dismissals, or other legal remedies as appropriate. The document does not provide information on the final orders for the listed cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.